<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michelle Malkin Should Be Taken Off the Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:08:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik Samdahl</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Dawn, you don&#039;t think I&#039;m a right-wing asshole? What gives you that impression? ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn, you don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m a right-wing asshole? What gives you that impression? ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Samdahl</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott, you make a good point. It&#039;s about time people start standing up to these Fox commentators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott, you make a good point. It&#8217;s about time people start standing up to these Fox commentators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/#comment-633</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve said just what I&#039;ve been thinking for almost a week now with one exception-- Rachel Ray should file a restraint of trade suit against Malkin. The Fox thugs tend to forget that they get away with telling outright lies about political figures because of generally sensible laws that prohibit members of the government from punishing the public over criticism. Trying to turn Rachel Ray into a political figure, however, doesn&#039;t make her one; not legally and (come on, now) not aestheticly. Being a spokesmodel is one of the two things (that we know of) that she does to make money. Tainting her bankability for make-believe news purposes is definitely actionable ( see Carol Burnett Vs. The National Enquirer; remember the spectacle of having to drag Henry Kissinger away doing something important just to say, for the record, that Burnett wasn&#039;t drunkenly spilling things all over him at a formal dinner?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve said just what I&#8217;ve been thinking for almost a week now with one exception&#8211; Rachel Ray should file a restraint of trade suit against Malkin. The Fox thugs tend to forget that they get away with telling outright lies about political figures because of generally sensible laws that prohibit members of the government from punishing the public over criticism. Trying to turn Rachel Ray into a political figure, however, doesn&#8217;t make her one; not legally and (come on, now) not aestheticly. Being a spokesmodel is one of the two things (that we know of) that she does to make money. Tainting her bankability for make-believe news purposes is definitely actionable ( see Carol Burnett Vs. The National Enquirer; remember the spectacle of having to drag Henry Kissinger away doing something important just to say, for the record, that Burnett wasn&#8217;t drunkenly spilling things all over him at a formal dinner?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/28/michelle-malkin-should-be-taken-off-the-air/#comment-632</guid>
		<description>LOL, No, I hadn&#039;t heard about this, but you&#039;re right on target:  I vote to have you to take Malkin&#039;s place on Fox...but then again, you probably aren&#039;t a right-wing assh***.  Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, No, I hadn&#8217;t heard about this, but you&#8217;re right on target:  I vote to have you to take Malkin&#8217;s place on Fox&#8230;but then again, you probably aren&#8217;t a right-wing assh***.  Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
