<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch the Saw 5 Teaser Trailer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/07/28/watch-the-saw-5-teaser-trailer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/07/28/watch-the-saw-5-teaser-trailer/</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:08:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik Samdahl</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/07/28/watch-the-saw-5-teaser-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/07/28/watch-the-saw-5-teaser-trailer/#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Hi JayMike, the first one was good in concept, but the direction, acting and writing sort of ruined it for me. I actually liked the third one the best, but hated the second and fourth ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JayMike, the first one was good in concept, but the direction, acting and writing sort of ruined it for me. I actually liked the third one the best, but hated the second and fourth ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayMike</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/07/28/watch-the-saw-5-teaser-trailer/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>JayMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/07/28/watch-the-saw-5-teaser-trailer/#comment-803</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if i totally agree. The first one was good. The second one was ok. the 3 one on the other hand could have been better but the fourth one was cool because i had to watch it twice to fully understand what was going on. So to me it&#039;s a definite buy on blu ray or regular DVD but I&#039;m not going to the theater to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if i totally agree. The first one was good. The second one was ok. the 3 one on the other hand could have been better but the fourth one was cool because i had to watch it twice to fully understand what was going on. So to me it&#8217;s a definite buy on blu ray or regular DVD but I&#8217;m not going to the theater to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
