Comments on: Harry Potter 6 Release Date Pushed Back to 2010

By: Simone Luck Black

Simone Luck Black — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:38:25 +0000

And honestly,it doesn’t matter when it will come out… there will be record sales anyway.This IS HP we are talking about…
And yes,I think it will make a difference the fact that the original screenwriter is back on this one.I hate the 5th movie,it’s much better reading the books.

By: Simone Luck Black

Simone Luck Black — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:32:18 +0000

Dale,The Half Blood Prince will be a ‘one piece’.The Deathly Hollows will be parted in 2 because they can’t get rid of scenes w/o f**king up the whole movie(like they did with the 5th one <_< )

By: Erik Samdahl

Erik Samdahl — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:48:15 +0000

Glad you agree! It would have been neat to have a book-to-movie director’s cut; the problem there is that editing certain storylines out of a film after it’s been shot can often be tricky and end up looking cluttered. I’m pretty happy with how most of the films turned out, even if some storylines were dropped.

At least the screenwriter from the first four has returned for this one. Let’s see if it makes the difference.

By: Geof

Geof — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:28:36 +0000

I’m glad someone else agrees with me that the fifth Harry Potter film was the worst so far.

The acting performance was as good as ever, which was let down, in my opinion, by such an awful script.

If all the films had been made as per the books to satisfy dvd sales, with an edited issue for the cinemas, they could have been as brilliant as the books.

Geof

By: Erik Samdahl

Erik Samdahl — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:10:31 +0000

Hi Sierra,

Don’t worry – the movie is still coming out in a couple of weeks.

By: Sierra

Sierra — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:20:43 +0000

Really, they are just about ready to loose a lot of fans that grew up with the novel. They are reaching an age now where this is no longer interesting to them and the younger generation is not all hyped up on Harry Potter when there is… Transformers, Up and soo much more. Why would they want to watch 5 films the oldest a 9 year old film to catch up to this one. So the more they stretch it out for 2 more years, to get a better dollar value is really just gonna backfire.

By: Kevin Smit

Kevin Smit — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:42:32 +0000

I honestly think it’s the most rediculas idea i’ve heard they are scared Harry Potter wouldn’t do well in November cuz there is lots of compotition in the november season, but now they have pushed it to round about the same time when transformers 2 and spiderman 4 is coming out!Probleble the 2 worst competitors 2 have! what a great idea! put it next to the big movies!

By: bobly

bobly — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:52:24 +0000

yo im disopointed of the delay
BRING OUT THE FILM FOR DAM SAKE
IF YOU DONY U R GAY

By: Erik Samdahl

Erik Samdahl — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:19:00 +0000

I’m actually happy they are doing it in two parts – I think even a three hour movie would struggle to include everything that happens in the books. The first couple of movies were 2.5 hours long, and those were based on some of the smaller books.

By: dale256

dale256 — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:58:05 +0000

Hate to say this, but another site said that the release of the part 1 will be during the summer of 2010 and part 2 during the summer 2011. Not sure if that true or not. What irks me is them putting this 2 parts. HP fans would sit throught the entire thing even if it was 3 hours long. If people can sit through “Out of Africa”, and movie about living with aps, then they would definatly sit through a long HP movie.