<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; Miscellaneous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/category/miscellaneous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Roman Polanski Arrested, Faces Extradition</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/27/roman-polanski-arrested-faces-extradition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/27/roman-polanski-arrested-faces-extradition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roman Polanski is no longer &#8220;wanted and desired,&#8221; as he&#8217;s been arrested by the Swiss police for having sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1977, according to an article by the Associated Press. He could now face extradition to the United States for the crime that caused him to flee from France.
Polanski, who is now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1504" title="Roman Polanski" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/roman-polanski.jpg" alt="Roman Polanski" width="225" height="225" />Roman Polanski is no longer &#8220;wanted and desired,&#8221; as he&#8217;s been arrested by the Swiss police for having sex with a 13-year-old girl in 1977, according to an article by the <em>Associated Press</em>. He could now face extradition to the United States for the crime that caused him to flee from France.</p>
<p>Polanski, who is now 76 years old, was on his way to the Zurich Film Festival to receive an honorary award when he was stopped by police. The U.S. will now have to file an extradition claim to have him deported to Los Angeles.<span id="more-1503"></span></p>
<p>Polanski is the director of such classics as <em>Rosemary&#8217;s Baby</em> and <em>Chinatown</em>, but is equally famous for being a fugitive who fled from the U.S. a year after pleading guilty to having sex with Samantha Geimer. Geimer has agreed with Polanski that the charges be dropped, saying &#8220;she wants the case to be over.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more about <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090927/ap_on_en_mo/eu_switzerland_polanski">Polanski&#8217;s arrest</a> here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/27/roman-polanski-arrested-faces-extradition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FilmJabber: The iPhone Movie Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/19/filmjabber-the-iphone-movie-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/19/filmjabber-the-iphone-movie-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have an iPhone, you can now visit the FilmJabber Movie Blog with native iPhone support. No more zooming or scrolling about the screen &#8211; just visit the URL http://blog.filmjabber.com/ and you&#8217;ll have access to all of our amazingly awesome and unbeatable articles in an easy-to-read, easy-to-comment-on format. Check it out now and make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/"><img style="border:0px" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1485" title="iPhone Movie Blog" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/iphone.jpg" alt="iPhone Movie Blog" width="128" height="225" /></a>If you have an iPhone, you can now visit the FilmJabber <a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/"><strong>Movie Blog </strong></a>with native iPhone support. No more zooming or scrolling about the screen &#8211; just visit the URL <a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/"><strong>http://blog.filmjabber.com/</strong></a> and you&#8217;ll have access to all of our amazingly awesome and unbeatable articles in an easy-to-read, easy-to-comment-on format. Check it out now and make sure to add us to your bookmarks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/19/filmjabber-the-iphone-movie-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. Patrick Swayze</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/14/r-i-p-patrick-swayze/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/14/r-i-p-patrick-swayze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Swayze has unfortunately passed away at the age of 57. He died after battling pancreatic cancer, a particularly deadly form of the disease. He passed away peacefully with his family at his side.
Despite his diagnosis becoming front-page news in early 2008 (including reports that he had days to live), he continued to work, primarily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1479" title="Patrick Swayze" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/patrick-swayze.jpg" alt="Patrick Swayze" width="225" height="225" />Patrick Swayze has unfortunately passed away at the age of 57. He died after battling pancreatic cancer, a particularly deadly form of the disease. He passed away peacefully with his family at his side.</p>
<p>Despite his diagnosis becoming front-page news in early 2008 (including reports that he had days to live), he continued to work, primarily on the recently canceled A&amp;E series &#8220;The Beast,&#8221; in which he played a rogue cop. Swayze is best known for his roles in <strong>Dirty Dancing</strong> and <strong>Ghost</strong>. Though he was rarely seen in any major releases since the early-to-mid nineties (following his turn as an adrenaline-loving bad guy in <strong>Point Break</strong>), Swayze was a worldwide star, whose credits also included <strong>Red Dawn</strong> (one of my favorites) and <strong>Donnie Darko</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/09/14/r-i-p-patrick-swayze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Weasley Has Swine Flu</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/04/ron-weasley-has-swine-flu/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/04/ron-weasley-has-swine-flu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron weasley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rupert grint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s something random: Rupert Grint, who plays Ron Weasley in the Harry Potter movies, has swine flu. His publicist reported that the young man is on his death bed&#8230; or, at least, he has the sniffles.
&#8220;It has just been confirmed that Rupert Grint has taken a few days out of filming due to a mild [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1318" title="Ron Weasley Has Swine Flu" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ron-weasley-swine-flu.jpg" alt="Ron Weasley Has Swine Flu" width="225" height="252" />Here&#8217;s something random: Rupert Grint, who plays Ron Weasley in the <strong>Harry Potter</strong> movies, has swine flu. His publicist reported that the young man is on his death bed&#8230; or, at least, he has the sniffles.</p>
<p>&#8220;It has just been confirmed that <span id="lw_1246729588_6" class="yshortcuts" style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer;">Rupert Grint</span> has taken a few days out of filming due to a mild bout of swine flu,&#8221; the publicist&#8217;s statement said, according to <a href="http://" target="_self"><strong>this article by the AFP</strong></a>.<span id="more-1317"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;He has now recovered and is looking forward to joining his fellow cast members at the junket and premieres this week and will then return to filming directly afterwards.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s clearly so serious that he will still attend the premiere of <strong>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</strong> and &#8220;risk&#8221; infecting his co-stars. The urgency of swine flu is renewed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/04/ron-weasley-has-swine-flu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird People at the Movies</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/21/weird-people-at-the-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/21/weird-people-at-the-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audiences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to go see The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 at the Regal Meridian in downtown Seattle tonight with my buddy Tom. Tom, a college roommate and one of my best friends, is one who you should go to the movies with not at all, depending on your movie watching preferences. There&#8217;s nothing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to go see <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3317/"><strong>The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3</strong></a> at the Regal Meridian in downtown Seattle tonight with my buddy Tom. Tom, a college roommate and one of my best friends, is one who you should go to the movies with not at all, depending on your movie watching preferences. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with Tom, you see, but Tom has the strange ability to attract the crazies to the movie theater &#8211; so if you need peace and quite while watching a movie, he is not the guy to go see a movie with.<span id="more-1289"></span></p>
<p>There was the time when we sat in front of the family of obese individuals who liked to kick our seats while eating loudly and breathing even louder in a very arduous, uncomfortable way. Sad, but true. Or when the guy a few seats down from us started talking on his cell phone in the middle of the movie. Or tonight, where we had not one, not two, but three different sets of weird or annoying moviegoers.</p>
<p>The first bunch was innocent enough. Two guys sat down practically right in front of us, and as box office results for <strong>The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3</strong> suggest, the theater wasn&#8217;t exactly full. To make matters worse, one of the guys &#8211; the tallest guy, who had a clump of curly, oily hair &#8211; got up and then moved even more in front of us, forcing us to move down. Of course, that didn&#8217;t stop two other people &#8211; thankfully rather short people &#8211; from sitting down in front of us after the movie had started.</p>
<p>But everyone deals with people like this who are either unaware or just don&#8217;t care that it&#8217;s rude to sit right in front of someone else in a half-empty theater. However&#8230;</p>
<p>Things began to get weird when a big guy off to the side decided he wanted some candy&#8230; and no, not just any candy but <em>his</em> candy, the same candy that his girlfriend &#8211; whom he&#8217;d been fighting with before the movie started &#8211; allegedly had.</p>
<p>Twenty minutes into the film, we hear, &#8220;I want my candy.&#8221; Not a shout, but not a whisper. A few moments pass, and we get another, &#8220;I want my candy!&#8221; This time, much longer. After a couple more rather loud demands&#8230; er, requests&#8230; he apparently got his candy, because he shut up. The man later stripped down to a wife beater that was much too small for him. Apparently that candy made him sweaty.</p>
<p>On the other side of the theater, however, was where the golden gem of the evening was sitting. A man, probably in his fifties with white hair and slightly overweight, had bad circulation. At least, that&#8217;s what I can assume. Because every five minutes or so, he had to rub his hands together. Hard and fast, like he was warming them up. This hand rubbing &#8211; which was distinctly loud and heard all the way across the theater by everyone (even during the action scenes) &#8211; lasted for about 20 seconds and varied in velocity and intensity. Maybe he just liked the feel of his own skin.</p>
<p>Though rubbing of the hands is innocent enough, the man&#8217;s timing and dedication to such a habit makes him one of the weirdest people I&#8217;ve had the pleasure of watching the movie with. Even though there&#8217;s little comedy in <strong>The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3</strong>, he had Tom and I &#8211; as well as several other people in the audience &#8211; cracking up at the absurdity of it all. Who does that in a public place, repeatedly and oblivious to those around you?</p>
<p>What are your weird moviegoing stories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/21/weird-people-at-the-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is IMAX Destroying Its Brand?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/15/is-imax-destroying-its-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/15/is-imax-destroying-its-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aziz ansari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aziz is bored]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imax rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last couple of years have been full of story&#8217;s about IMAX&#8217;s success. Ever since the theater chain, which was originally dedicated to documentaries filmed with clunky cameras, started showing &#8220;real&#8221; movies, its revenues have skyrocketed, and for good reason. People pay &#8211; and they do pay &#8211; a premium of up to $5 (more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1166" title="Aziz Ansari is pissed at IMAX theaters" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/aziz-ansari-imax.jpg" alt="Aziz Ansari is pissed at IMAX theaters" width="225" height="169" />The last couple of years have been full of story&#8217;s about IMAX&#8217;s success. Ever since the theater chain, which was originally dedicated to documentaries filmed with clunky cameras, started showing &#8220;real&#8221; movies, its revenues have skyrocketed, and for good reason. People pay &#8211; and they <em>do</em> pay &#8211; a premium of up to $5 (more if you buy online) to go see the latest blockbuster on a massive screen with excellent sound and near-vertical seating.</p>
<p>But Aziz Ansari, one of the stars in the NBC comedy &#8220;Parks and Recreation,&#8221; has<strong> <a href="http://azizisbored.tumblr.com/post/106587114/reblog-the-fuck-out-of-this-warning-amc-theaters-are" target="_blank">unleashed a firestorm</a></strong> against the company for diluting the IMAX brand and robbing him of dollars that were unnecessarily spent. And I have to agree with him&#8230;<span id="more-1164"></span></p>
<p>Last Thursday night, I went to <strong>Star Trek</strong> at the Pacific Science Center IMAX in Seattle. This is real IMAX. I waited in line and I got seated in front of a kickass, six-story-tall screen that went from floor to ceiling. The screen is huge, and the seating, which runs much steeper than the traditional movie theater, guarantees you won&#8217;t glancing around someone&#8217;s fat head to see everything. In other words, it&#8217;s a unique experience that provides great sound, crystal clear display and an overall different perspective than a typical theater does. Even though <strong>Star Trek</strong> was not filmed in IMAX format as were parts of <strong>The Dark Knight</strong> last year, it was still a cool, in-your-face experience.</p>
<p>Having grown up in Seattle, this is what I come to expect of IMAX. As far as I know, IMAX screens are big, the seating steep and the sound engulfing in every part of the country. At least they used to be.</p>
<p>On Sunday, I went to <strong>Star Trek</strong> for a second time, this time by visiting Lincoln Square Cinemas in Bellevue, WA. Lincoln Square is an awesome theater with comfortable seats and large screens, but they had just upgraded by installing an IMAX theater. Awesome. So Lincoln Square tore out one of its theaters, installed vertical seating and a large screen, and now has the right to charge extra for that particular theater, right? Wrong!</p>
<p>To my disappointment, the screen was a little bigger &#8211; vertically at least &#8211; but the seating was just normal, old stadium-riser seating. I could clearly see IMAX projectors up in the booth, and the movie did look great&#8230; but it still felt like a normal movie for the most part. The IMAX experience was not to be found, but I did manage to spend a lot more money on my tickets.</p>
<p>From the sounds of it, Aziz went to an &#8220;IMAX&#8221; theater that was much smaller than the normal IMAX screen. If that&#8217;s the case, and from what I hear, it is, that really, really sucks. I felt a bit shafted, but not enough to ask for my money back. If I went into an alleged IMAX screen that ended up being a quarter of the size of a regular screen, I would be pissed. Either way, I&#8217;m not going to shell out money for marginally better picture and sound at Lincoln Square&#8217;s IMAX screen again.</p>
<p>So, all of this is very troubling. Sure, IMAX is making great profits right now (actually, the company itself is not profitable due to debt payments, but its revenue grew 43% in the first quarter of 2009 so it&#8217;s well on its way), but this expansion could destroy it in a long run. IMAX has always represented uber-quality and superior experience, but without distinguishing its fake IMAX screens from its real ones, it is going to dilute its brand strength quickly. It&#8217;s funny that Aziz brought this up, as the thought had been nagging at me all week; it wasn&#8217;t until he pointed it out and his rant made headlines that I realized how horrible of a strategy this was.</p>
<p>Regal, AMC, IMAX and other chains should think long and hard about how they want to position these new digital screens in the future. Call them IMAX Digital, or &#8220;with IMAX technology,&#8221; but for God&#8217;s sake, don&#8217;t fool moviegoers into spending their hard-earned cash by not distinguishing between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/15/is-imax-destroying-its-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Joker Killed In Shenandoah National Park</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/03/12/the-joker-killed-in-shenandoah-national-park/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/03/12/the-joker-killed-in-shenandoah-national-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stabbing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Associated Press, the Batman villain The Joker was shot and killed by police in Shenandoah National Park. Reported just a few hours ago, an FBI affidavit explains that a soldier &#8220;dressed and wearing face-paint like&#8230; The Joker&#8221; was killed when he pointed a loaded shotgun at police following a chase.
Army Spc. Christopher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <em>The Associated Press</em>, the Batman villain The Joker was shot and killed by police in Shenandoah National Park. Reported just a few hours ago, an FBI affidavit explains that a soldier &#8220;dressed and wearing face-paint like&#8230; The Joker&#8221; was killed when he pointed a loaded shotgun at police following a chase.</p>
<p>Army Spc. Christopher Lanum was a suspect in the stabbing Spc. Mitchell Stone at Fort Eustis. Stone says that Lanum, who idolized the character of The Joker, stabbed him and used a taser gun on him before fleeing. <span id="more-908"></span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an explanation of how things went down, directly from the <em>AP</em> article:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Lanum and [his girlfriend Patsy Ann Marie] Montowski fled in her van, which a <span id="lw_1236904745_6" class="yshortcuts">park ranger</span> spotted about 200 miles northwest of the base, according to authorities. The ranger called for help, and Lanum led police on a slow-speed chase before running over a spike strip laid down by police and crashing, they added.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The FBI said Montowski told them that Lanum handed her the shotgun and asked her to kill him, but she refused. The affidavit says Lanum pointed the gun at police, his <span id="lw_1236904745_7" class="yshortcuts">finger on the trigger</span>, and refused commands to drop the weapon. A trooper fired through the driver&#8217;s side window, Lanum&#8217;s shotgun discharged, and police fired several times.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The trooper and <span id="lw_1236904745_8" class="yshortcuts">park rangers</span> involved in the shooting were placed on administrative leave with pay pending the outcome of <span id="lw_1236904745_9" class="yshortcuts">internal investigations</span>, according to a joint <span id="lw_1236904745_10" class="yshortcuts">state police</span>, FBI and <span id="lw_1236904745_11" class="yshortcuts">National Park Service release</span>.</em></p>
<p>The girlfriend was injured by gunfire and has since been charged with being an accessory after the fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/03/12/the-joker-killed-in-shenandoah-national-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top 10 Movie Food Moments</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/02/18/the-top-10-movie-food-moments/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/02/18/the-top-10-movie-food-moments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10 movie food moments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stefanie over at Endless Simmer sent me a link to a blog post on her site about the top 10 movie food moments of all time. It&#8217;s a clever way to take advantage of the upcoming Oscars show by a site that generally has nothing to do with movies.
I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefanie over at Endless Simmer sent me a link to a blog post on her site about the top 10 movie food moments of all time. It&#8217;s a clever way to take advantage of the upcoming Oscars show by a site that generally has nothing to do with movies.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with all the scenes mentioned in the list, but it&#8217;s fun to look at anyway.</p>
<p>Alternatively, I would have recommended the orgasm scene from<strong> When Harry Met Sally</strong> and the puking scene in <strong>Stand By Me</strong>. However, I absolutely agree with their inclusion of the scene from <strong>Ratatouille</strong>.</p>
<p>Check out the top <strong><a href="http://www.endlesssimmer.com/2009/02/18/our-kind-of-oscars-top-10-movie-food-moments">10 movie food moments</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/02/18/the-top-10-movie-food-moments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Twilight Series is No Harry Potter</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/02/14/the-twilight-series-is-no-harry-potter/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/02/14/the-twilight-series-is-no-harry-potter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephenie meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched Twilight when it came to theaters. It was surprisingly pretty good, even though it was focused more on the hormones of a teenage girl than on anything more macro such as good versus evil or protagonist versus antagonist (though one would argue that the complexities of a woman cannot be topped).
Following that, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-826" title="Twilight Books" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/twilight-books.jpg" alt="Twilight Books" width="250" height="375" />I watched <strong>Twilight</strong> when it came to theaters. It was surprisingly pretty good, even though it was focused more on the hormones of a teenage girl than on anything more macro such as good versus evil or protagonist versus antagonist (though one would argue that the complexities of a woman cannot be topped).</p>
<p>Following that, I went on to read all four of the <strong>Twilight</strong> books by Stephenie Meyer. I had heard they were good, so I was willing to give them a chance. The first book was good and quite entertaining, as Bella attempted to discover what the mystery was behind Edward. The second book, however, was just OK.</p>
<p><strong>New Moon</strong>, which is hastily being made into a movie this year, is not going to make much of a movie at all. The first half of the book is pretty good, as Bella starts up a quasi-relationship with Jacob, her soon-to-be-werewolf best friend. In reality, the book is just a retread of the first one, only with a werewolf in place of a vampire. Bella sure knows how to pick them, doesn&#8217;t she? It&#8217;s entertaining, but when it devolves into a race to save Edward from the Volturi, it takes a turn for the worse. Meyer ends the book with absolutely no action, and in fact there is only one suspenseful moment in the entire novel. How will this become a good movie? It&#8217;s hard to imagine.</p>
<p>Thankfully, <strong>Eclipse</strong> is a much-better book. Victoria, who has been lurking in the shadows since the first novel, amasses a vampire army to take down the Cullens and kill Bella. The result? A vampire vs. vampire vs. werewolf battle, which, if done right, should be amazing on the silver screen. <strong>Eclipse</strong> is exciting, smart and entertaining, and will make a perfect finish to the trilogy.</p>
<p>Except&#8230; the series doesn&#8217;t end as a trilogy. It ends with <strong>Breaking Dawn</strong>, a shockingly disappointing finish that takes the characters in unwanted directions. Bella finally gets to screw Edward, but not until he&#8217;s convinced her to marry at a young age (is this meant to teach young girls a moral lesson? It&#8217;s not &#8220;don&#8217;t have sex until you&#8217;re married.&#8221; It&#8217;s &#8220;if you want to have sex, get married so you can have sex.&#8221;). Then she gets knocked up, and spends much of the rest of the book lying around on her death bed, so much so that Meyer has to shift the narrative to Jacob to progress the story. Ouch. Eventually, Bella becomes a vampire, and this is the best thing that happens to her: however, how can you top being immortal and wanting to eat other humans?  Of course, Bella doesn&#8217;t get to suffer any of the consequences, as her father shrugs off her conversion with minimal conflict (that&#8217;s convenient) and she doesn&#8217;t have any of the urges a newborn vampire should have.</p>
<p>To cap it all off, Meyer sets up a gigantic battle between the Cullens and the Volturi, and then decides not to have a satisfying finale at all. <strong>Harry Potter</strong>, the <strong>Twilight</strong> series is not.</p>
<p>Essentially, the <strong>Twilight</strong> series is an entertaining series that doesn&#8217;t have a plot or much else. Unlike <strong>Harry Potter</strong>, which carefully and intelligently progresses its stories along to a massive, satisfying climax, Meyer seems more concerned about fitting her frustratingly annoying lead character into a childhood dream of immortality and endless love. The books aren&#8217;t bad, but they are overrated, and it&#8217;s sad that any young girl may idolize Bella. Bella is annoying, and her attempts to be selfless generally results in her being as selfish as possible. Driven by hormones and a silly, youthful love, she is willing to give up everything, including her family and friends, for her lover. That&#8217;s just pathetic.</p>
<p>The only reason I&#8217;m dwelling on the moral aspects of the story is because I&#8217;m disappointed by the general story arc of the books. They&#8217;re written by a woman for girls &#8211; and I am neither a woman nor a girl &#8211; so I understand that I&#8217;m not in the target audience. But when you write a story about vampires and werewolves and don&#8217;t follow through with such things&#8230; well, it&#8217;s embarrassing that this series is compared to <strong>Harry Potter</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/02/14/the-twilight-series-is-no-harry-potter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Romantic Comedies Will Ruin Your Love Life</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/09/study-romantic-comedies-will-ruin-your-love-life/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/09/study-romantic-comedies-will-ruin-your-love-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/09/study-romantic-comedies-will-ruin-your-love-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, I know what you&#8217;re thinking. You take your girl to a romantic comedy, she is happy, you suffer only a little bit, and it pays off later in the evening. That&#8217;s all fine and good. But if you&#8217;re serious about the girl &#8211; or ladies, if you&#8217;re serious about the man (I suppose this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, I know what you&#8217;re thinking. You take your girl to a romantic comedy, she is happy, you suffer only a little bit, and it pays off later in the evening. That&#8217;s all fine and good. But if you&#8217;re serious about the girl &#8211; or ladies, if you&#8217;re serious about the man (I suppose this would apply to same-sex couples as well) &#8211; it&#8217;s best to avoid romantic comedies at all costs!</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because they will spoil your love life.</p>
<p>And no, I&#8217;m not kidding. I meant to post this article a couple weeks ago, but I got distracted by other things&#8230; like booze, football, food, movies and so on and so forth.</p>
<p>The good folk over at Heriot Watt University in Edinburgh say that, based on a recent study, romantic comedies set unrealistic expectations about love and sex, causing them to &#8220;fail to communicate with their partner.&#8221; You can read more over at <a href="http://buzzsugar.com/2618520">BuzzSugar.com</a>, but these findings do make sense. Things don&#8217;t always end up happily ever after, and even if they do, they might not be <em>that</em> happy. And have you ever tried chasing after an ex who has just driven to the airport, managed to sneak through security and not get tackled within 20 feet? I&#8217;ve tried three times and it still hasn&#8217;t succeeded.</p>
<p>Damn you, romantic comedies! Damn you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/09/study-romantic-comedies-will-ruin-your-love-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
