<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; 2009 golden globes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/2009-golden-globes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Golden Globe Winners: The Right Choices?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 golden globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golden globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t bother watching the Golden Globes on Sunday, generally because I don&#8217;t watch the Golden Globes ever. I remember tuning in a few years ago and thinking that it was one of the most boring award shows I&#8217;ve watched (then again, I generally only watch the Oscars). That being said, I was actually planning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t bother watching the Golden Globes on Sunday, generally because I don&#8217;t watch the Golden Globes ever. I remember tuning in a few years ago and thinking that it was one of the most boring award shows I&#8217;ve watched (then again, I generally only watch the Oscars). That being said, I was actually planning on watching the Golden Globes this year, but then it donned on me:</p>
<ol>
<li>For some insane reason, the Golden Globes were not being shown live on the west coast &#8211; why watch when I can just get the results online before the show even starts?</li>
<li><em>24</em> started at the same time. And yes, I do have DVR.</li>
</ol>
<p>So, now that everyone else has written about the Golden Globes, I figured I&#8217;d finally get around to commenting on them. After all, I like to be fashionably late. Here are my random thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong> won Best Drama. Even though I liked <em>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</em> more, <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em> is the most ambitious of the nominated pictures and perhaps most deserving. Still, the movie is a bit overrated and in other years would be considered an outside chance at best. If you look at the nominees for Best Picture, it&#8217;s a rather sorry bunch: all good, but none amazing.</li>
<li><strong>Kate Winslet</strong> won acting awards for both <strong>The Reader</strong> and <strong>Revolutionary Road</strong>. Good for her. She&#8217;s a great actress and deserving of recognition. Still, I&#8217;d probably say Anne Hathaway had a more breakout role in <em>Rachel Getting Married</em> and Meryl Streep was more commanding in <em>Doubt</em>, but Winslet was probably most overdue.</li>
<li><strong>Mickey Rourke</strong> won for Best Actor in a Drama. Good for him, and what a comeback. I&#8217;m still 50/50 between Rourke and Penn, and generally lean toward Penn &#8211; but then again, we expect greatness from Penn. I must note that having watched <em>Revolutionary Road</em>, Leonardo DiCaprio has once again turned in an amazing performance.</li>
<li><strong>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</strong> won for Best Comedy/Musical. This once again shows the prestige that Woody Allen still carries among foreign critics and Hollywood in general. I just received the film on DVD and have yet to see it, but I&#8217;ve heard very mixed things about it. Then again, Allen should be awarded just for getting Scarlett Johansson and Penelope Cruz to make out. <em>In Bruges</em> is by far the best comedy on the list, though I never expected that one to win.</li>
<li><strong>Sally Hawkins</strong> won for <strong>Happy Go-Lucky</strong>. I haven&#8217;t seen it, so I can&#8217;t comment. All that I can say is that there should only be one acting category &#8211; not separate ones for drama and comedy. Whereas I understand the reason to split comedies and dramas into two awards, a good performance is a good performance, regardless of the genre. It&#8217;s good to see Colin Farrell actually win for something.</li>
<li><strong>Heath Ledger</strong> won for <strong>The Dark Knight</strong>. Of course. Would the venue had been burned down if he hadn&#8217;t won, and would the winner have had the balls to go on stage?</li>
<li><strong>Wall-E</strong> won for Best Animated Picture. Of course.</li>
<li>Despite my reservations for <strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong>, Danny Boyle deservedly won for Best Director. I still don&#8217;t understand why Ron Howard was nominated in this category.</li>
<li>I won&#8217;t comment on the TV awards as much, other than that I am currently watching <strong>John Adams</strong> (HBO) and can understand why it raked in the dough. The series isn&#8217;t perfect, but for a TV mini-series it is quite impressive. The actors who won certainly deserved it (though I haven&#8217;t seen many of the competing shows).</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
