<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Death at a Funeral Remake: Great Idea. Or not.</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/09/death-at-a-funeral-remake-great-idea-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/09/death-at-a-funeral-remake-great-idea-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death at a funeral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The original Death at a Funeral was pretty good. Not great, but good. It was also made in 2007, with English-speaking actors, many of whom are recognizable. It was directed by Frank Oz. And they&#8217;re remaking it. Remaking a two-year old movie that already received a U.S. release. What the hell?
This remake, of all remakes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1025" title="I bet Peter Dinklage will be in the remake" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/death-at-a-funeral.jpg" alt="I bet Peter Dinklage will be in the remake" width="225" height="226" />The original <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2691/"><strong>Death at a Funeral</strong></a> was pretty good. Not great, but good. It was also made in 2007, with English-speaking actors, many of whom are recognizable. It was directed by Frank Oz. And they&#8217;re remaking it. Remaking a two-year old movie that already received a U.S. release. What the hell?</p>
<p>This remake, of all remakes that have come before it, crosses the line of artistic integrity. Sure, there have been perfectly good films that were remade only a few years later in the form of <strong>Vanilla Sky</strong> and <strong>The Ring</strong> and several others. Those remakes are annoying enough, because if you watch the originals they are just as good or better, and not at all dated. They just don&#8217;t star as marketable actors as Hollywood can bring to the table. And they&#8217;re in a different language, made in another country, and there are a lot of people who don&#8217;t like subtitles for some sad, misguided reason (you&#8217;re exempt if you are visually impaired, of course).<span id="more-1024"></span></p>
<p>But to remake a perfectly good English-language film that everyone can see, most people had the opportunity to see in theaters, everyone has had the opportunity to rent&#8230; that&#8217;s just ridiculous. It&#8217;s artistically stupid. Hell, it&#8217;s artistically insulting.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re wondering, the remake will star Chris Rock, Tracy Morgan, Martin Lawrence and Zoe Saldana- oh, and Kevin Hart just joined the cast. OK, there are some big names in there, but if you look at the box office history of these actors, they&#8217;re not exactly going to rake in the dough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/09/death-at-a-funeral-remake-great-idea-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
