<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Golden Globe Winners: The Right Choices?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 golden globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golden globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t bother watching the Golden Globes on Sunday, generally because I don&#8217;t watch the Golden Globes ever. I remember tuning in a few years ago and thinking that it was one of the most boring award shows I&#8217;ve watched (then again, I generally only watch the Oscars). That being said, I was actually planning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t bother watching the Golden Globes on Sunday, generally because I don&#8217;t watch the Golden Globes ever. I remember tuning in a few years ago and thinking that it was one of the most boring award shows I&#8217;ve watched (then again, I generally only watch the Oscars). That being said, I was actually planning on watching the Golden Globes this year, but then it donned on me:</p>
<ol>
<li>For some insane reason, the Golden Globes were not being shown live on the west coast &#8211; why watch when I can just get the results online before the show even starts?</li>
<li><em>24</em> started at the same time. And yes, I do have DVR.</li>
</ol>
<p>So, now that everyone else has written about the Golden Globes, I figured I&#8217;d finally get around to commenting on them. After all, I like to be fashionably late. Here are my random thoughts:</p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong> won Best Drama. Even though I liked <em>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</em> more, <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em> is the most ambitious of the nominated pictures and perhaps most deserving. Still, the movie is a bit overrated and in other years would be considered an outside chance at best. If you look at the nominees for Best Picture, it&#8217;s a rather sorry bunch: all good, but none amazing.</li>
<li><strong>Kate Winslet</strong> won acting awards for both <strong>The Reader</strong> and <strong>Revolutionary Road</strong>. Good for her. She&#8217;s a great actress and deserving of recognition. Still, I&#8217;d probably say Anne Hathaway had a more breakout role in <em>Rachel Getting Married</em> and Meryl Streep was more commanding in <em>Doubt</em>, but Winslet was probably most overdue.</li>
<li><strong>Mickey Rourke</strong> won for Best Actor in a Drama. Good for him, and what a comeback. I&#8217;m still 50/50 between Rourke and Penn, and generally lean toward Penn &#8211; but then again, we expect greatness from Penn. I must note that having watched <em>Revolutionary Road</em>, Leonardo DiCaprio has once again turned in an amazing performance.</li>
<li><strong>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</strong> won for Best Comedy/Musical. This once again shows the prestige that Woody Allen still carries among foreign critics and Hollywood in general. I just received the film on DVD and have yet to see it, but I&#8217;ve heard very mixed things about it. Then again, Allen should be awarded just for getting Scarlett Johansson and Penelope Cruz to make out. <em>In Bruges</em> is by far the best comedy on the list, though I never expected that one to win.</li>
<li><strong>Sally Hawkins</strong> won for <strong>Happy Go-Lucky</strong>. I haven&#8217;t seen it, so I can&#8217;t comment. All that I can say is that there should only be one acting category &#8211; not separate ones for drama and comedy. Whereas I understand the reason to split comedies and dramas into two awards, a good performance is a good performance, regardless of the genre. It&#8217;s good to see Colin Farrell actually win for something.</li>
<li><strong>Heath Ledger</strong> won for <strong>The Dark Knight</strong>. Of course. Would the venue had been burned down if he hadn&#8217;t won, and would the winner have had the balls to go on stage?</li>
<li><strong>Wall-E</strong> won for Best Animated Picture. Of course.</li>
<li>Despite my reservations for <strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong>, Danny Boyle deservedly won for Best Director. I still don&#8217;t understand why Ron Howard was nominated in this category.</li>
<li>I won&#8217;t comment on the TV awards as much, other than that I am currently watching <strong>John Adams</strong> (HBO) and can understand why it raked in the dough. The series isn&#8217;t perfect, but for a TV mini-series it is quite impressive. The actors who won certainly deserved it (though I haven&#8217;t seen many of the competing shows).</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/13/the-golden-globe-winners-the-right-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Golden Globes Prove They&#8217;re Stupid</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/12/11/the-golden-globes-prove-theyre-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/12/11/the-golden-globes-prove-theyre-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golden globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/12/11/the-golden-globes-prove-theyre-stupid/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve known it for years. We even talk about it: The Golden Globes are stupid. They&#8217;re like an elementary version of the Oscars, a way for lesser films to earn awards that would never win Oscars. Yes, the Golden Globes are considered a precursor to the Oscars, and often help in predicting what will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve known it for years. We even talk about it: <a href="http://omg.yahoo.com/golden-globes/nominees" target="_blank"><strong>The Golden Globes</strong></a> are stupid. They&#8217;re like an elementary version of the Oscars, a way for lesser films to earn awards that would never win Oscars. Yes, the Golden Globes are considered a precursor to the Oscars, and often help in predicting what will be nominated in the future.</p>
<p>But I sure as hell hope Oscar voters go a different direction. The Golden Globes all but snubbed <strong>The Dark Knight</strong>. It&#8217;s understandable if it&#8217;s left out of the Best Drama race, but doesn&#8217;t Christopher Nolan deserve a nod for Best Director? And Best Score? There is no film with a better score this year.</p>
<p><strong>Vicky Cristina Barcelona</strong> for Best Comedy? This one definitely shows how the Foreign Press think differently than those in America. I didn&#8217;t see it, but I didn&#8217;t hear it was all that good. And, frankly, there were much better comedies than such a film. Hell, it doesn&#8217;t really matter, though: <strong>Mamma Mia!</strong> will probably win, even though it doesn&#8217;t deserve it.</p>
<p>Another real surprise is Tom Cruise for <strong>Tropic Thunder</strong>. He was great in it, but Best Supporting Actor? For what is officially billed as an extended, over-the-top cameo? Really?</p>
<p>And where is <strong>Milk</strong> in the Best Picture category? I just got back from it and thought it deserves a chance. I haven&#8217;t seen four of the films on that list, but I have to say it edges out <strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong>, and I can&#8217;t imagine <strong>Frost/Nixon</strong> is better (I&#8217;ll be seeing that one soon enough).</p>
<p>When I look at the list, I guess it isn&#8217;t <em>that</em> bad, but there are just a few really weird choices here. On the flip side, I give them props for giving major kudos to <strong>In Bruges</strong>, which is certainly one of the best comedies of the year despite the fact that no one saw it.</p>
<p>Do you agree with the nominations? What got screwed? What was a surprise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/12/11/the-golden-globes-prove-theyre-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
