<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; new moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/new-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twilight Movie Trailer for New Moon Sucks</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/02/twilight-movie-trailer-for-new-moon-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/02/twilight-movie-trailer-for-new-moon-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Videos/Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight sequel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone watched the teaser movie trailer for the Twilight sequel New Moon? The teaser trailer is garbage. Absolute garbage. It looks like some kind of commercial for a TV movie, with the sappy romantic stuff at the beginning and the cheesy werewolf at the end.
And yes, I&#8217;ve read the books. All four of them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone watched the teaser movie trailer for the <strong>Twilight</strong> sequel <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3353/"><strong>New Moon</strong></a>? The teaser trailer is garbage. Absolute garbage. It looks like some kind of commercial for a TV movie, with the sappy romantic stuff at the beginning and the cheesy werewolf at the end.<span id="more-1220"></span></p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;ve read the books. All four of them. I know that <strong>New Moon</strong> is not going to make a good movie, but this teaser inspires no confidence whatsoever. It&#8217;s as if Summit Entertainment believes that they can just puke on the screen and that all of the fans &#8211; and the rest of the audiences necessary to make these movies viable &#8211; will gobble it up. Wow.</p>
<p>See for yourself:</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pYPgDW6ROAE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pYPgDW6ROAE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/02/twilight-movie-trailer-for-new-moon-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dakota Fanning to be Twilight&#8217;s Jane</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/26/dakota-fanning-to-be-twilights-jane/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/26/dakota-fanning-to-be-twilights-jane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dakota fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been on a reading tear. Since the beginning of the year, I&#8217;ve read at least five books, three of them from the hugely successful Stephenie Meyer Twilight franchise. Not having a huge respect for the Mormon religion, I was impressed with the relative depth of the first book. Having already seen the movie, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-771" title="Dakota Fanning is Jane" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dakota-fanning-246x300.jpg" alt="Dakota Fanning is Jane" width="246" height="300" />I&#8217;ve been on a reading tear. Since the beginning of the year, I&#8217;ve read at least five books, three of them from the hugely successful Stephenie Meyer <strong>Twilight</strong> franchise. Not having a huge respect for the Mormon religion, I was impressed with the relative depth of the first book. Having already seen the movie, it was well-written and entertaining &#8211; if not lacking just a bit in the suspense department.</p>
<p>The second book, <strong>New Moon</strong>, I did not like so much. It pretty much was a rehash of the first one, only with even less excitement. The development of Jacob&#8217;s character was good, but the book just fizzled in the end.</p>
<p>Much excitement has been made, however, for the casting of Jane in <strong>New Moon</strong>. Jane, who did not appear in the first book or movie, is a part of the royal vampire family in Italy. She is described as petite, blonde and angelic; she also tends to do the family&#8217;s dirty work and has a special power: inflicting torture. In <strong>Eclipse</strong> (which is excellent, by the way), Jane shows up at the end, and I&#8217;m guessing that she may play a bigger part in the finale, which I&#8217;m just beginning to read.</p>
<p>Director Chris Weitz has stated that Dakota Fanning is in the running for the role, and apparently offered her the part, no audition required. Fanning, a petite, blonde and angelic 14-year old, could certainly play the part. She has shied away from kiddie parts even as a little girl, and is known for acting older than her age &#8211; almost to a creepy degree. Thus, her general acting approach would work perfectly for the character of Jane.</p>
<p>As Fanning said herself, &#8220;It&#8217;s definitely possible. I really hope it works out. It would be a really fantastic experience I&#8217;m sure.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/26/dakota-fanning-to-be-twilights-jane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
