<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>(500) Days of Summer: The Best Romantic Comedy in Years?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/25/500-days-of-summer-the-best-romantic-comedy-in-years/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/25/500-days-of-summer-the-best-romantic-comedy-in-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500 days of summer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joseph gordon-levitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zooey deschanel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw (500) Days of Summer last night with a friend, and here&#8217;s my movie review for the film:
The romantic comedy: Boys meets girl. Boy gets in argument with girl. Boy reunites with girl. Movie ends. Every movie is the same, only with different characters and a slightly modified hook. Some are better than others [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/3369/review/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1364" title="500 Days of Summer review" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/500-days-of-summer.jpg" alt="500 Days of Summer review" width="225" height="192" /></a>I saw<strong> <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3369/">(500) Days of Summer</a></strong> last night with a friend, and here&#8217;s my movie review for the film:</p>
<p>The romantic comedy: Boys meets girl. Boy gets in argument with girl. Boy reunites with girl. Movie ends. Every movie is the same, only with different characters and a slightly modified hook. Some are better than others and legitimately entertaining. But in the end, they&#8217;re all predictable and unoriginal. So when <strong>(500) Days of Summer</strong> promises to be something different, you have to be intrigued &#8211; and skeptical.</p>
<p>Read the rest of my <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/3369/review/"><strong>500 Days of Summer movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/25/500-days-of-summer-the-best-romantic-comedy-in-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homecoming Movie Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/16/homecoming-movie-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/16/homecoming-movie-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homecoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mischa barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mischa Barton left The  O.C. at the end of season three, perhaps a wise move considering the  once-popular television series was fading quickly at that point. But even  though she got out just in time, Barton has yet to make a name for herself as  anyone but Marissa Cooper. Her latest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/3512/review/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1340" title="Mischa Barton in Homecoming" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/mischa-barton-homecoming.jpg" alt="Mischa Barton in Homecoming" width="225" height="203" /></a>Mischa Barton left <strong>The  O.C.</strong> at the end of season three, perhaps a wise move considering the  once-popular television series was fading quickly at that point. But even  though she got out just in time, Barton has yet to make a name for herself as  anyone but Marissa Cooper. Her latest film, the limited release thriller <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3512/"><strong>Homecoming</strong></a>, won&#8217;t change that, though  the movie itself is surprisingly easy to watch.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/3512/review/"><strong>Homecoming movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/16/homecoming-movie-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/15/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/15/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry potter 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The time is near, that when the Harry Potter franchise delivers its final whisk of the wand. The  tension is starting to build, and Harry  Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, the sixth entry in the blockbuster  franchise, is a key indicator of how the story of Harry, Ron and Hermione will  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/2276/review/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1336" title="Harry and Hermione" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/harry-potter.jpg" alt="Harry and Hermione" width="225" height="194" /></a>The time is near, that when the <strong>Harry Potter</strong> franchise delivers its final whisk of the wand. The  tension is starting to build, and <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2276/"><strong>Harry  Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</strong></a>, the sixth entry in the blockbuster  franchise, is a key indicator of how the story of Harry, Ron and Hermione will  end. David Yates, who also directed the previous <strong>Harry Potter</strong> film, is back at the helm &#8211; as he will be for the  final two movies &#8211; but there was no certainty that the franchise would end on a  high note. After sitting through two and a half hours of the latest <strong>Harry Potter</strong>, however, I can say with  confidence that I can&#8217;t wait for the final chapters to arrive.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/2276/review/"><strong>Harry Potter movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/07/15/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Star Trek (2009)</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It only took two weeks of summer to get to the good stuff,  as J.J. Abrams&#8217; Star Trek for  non-Trekkies has arrived, and it is quite a spectacle. Exciting action and an  entertaining, swift screenplay are capped by stunning visual effects in what  can only be described as the first blockbuster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1132" title="Star Trek rocks!" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/star-trek.jpg" alt="Star Trek rocks!" width="225" height="177" /></a>It only took two weeks of summer to get to the good stuff,  as J.J. Abrams&#8217; <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a> for  non-Trekkies has arrived, and it is quite a spectacle. Exciting action and an  entertaining, swift screenplay are capped by stunning visual effects in what  can only be described as the first blockbuster <strong>Star Trek</strong> of the franchise. It isn&#8217;t perfect, but it is one of  those movies I will be going to see again in theaters- and those don&#8217;t come  along very often.</p>
<p>As an introduction, I am a <strong>Star Trek</strong> fan. I am not, however, a Trekkie. I don&#8217;t dress up, I  don&#8217;t know the science behind warp drive and I can&#8217;t speak Klingon. I make fun  of Trekkies, but I also have enjoyed all of the television series save for &#8220;Enterprise&#8221;  and most of the movies. I watch both <strong>Star  Trek II: The Wrath of Khan</strong> and <strong>Star  Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country</strong> at least twice a year, and I am slugging  my way through the original series, of which I haven&#8217;t seen every episode.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/1559/review/"><strong>Star Trek movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: Caprica Pilot Episode</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/18/dvd-review-caprica-pilot-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/18/dvd-review-caprica-pilot-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television/TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battlestar galactica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bsg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caprica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pilot episode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Battlestar Galactica is done, but Caprica is just beginning.  Sci-Fi Channel hopes fans acknowledge that transition and stick around because  one is just like the other, right? Oh, and for the fact that the channel  doesn&#8217;t have much else to offer.
Caprica is set 50 years before BSG on Caprica, which in only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1066" title="Caprica Picture" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/caprica-bsg1.jpg" alt="Caprica Picture" width="233" height="232" />Battlestar Galactica</strong> is done, but <strong>Caprica</strong> is just beginning.  Sci-Fi Channel hopes fans acknowledge that transition and stick around because  one is just like the other, right? Oh, and for the fact that the channel  doesn&#8217;t have much else to offer.</p>
<p><strong>Caprica</strong> is set 50 years before <strong>BSG</strong> on Caprica, which in only a  few decades will be obliterated by Cylon nuclear weapons. The show, apparently,  will focus on political, religious and moral issues through the eyes of two  families &#8211; led by Daniel Graystone, a super-rich genius who is on the verge of  recreating life (read: Cylons) and an outsider with a powerful past, Joseph  Adama. Similar to today&#8217;s issues, the seemingly bright and shiny civilization  of Caprica is cracked with questionable ethics, corporate greed and personal  ambition that, as we all know, will eventually lead to their downfall.<span id="more-1061"></span></p>
<p>Whether <strong>BSG </strong>fans &#8211; myself included &#8211; stick around rests entirely on  the quality of this new show, which doesn&#8217;t officially debut until 2010. However,  Sci-Fi smartly &#8211; both to whet appetites and make a few million in the process &#8211;  will release the pilot episode of <strong>Caprica</strong> on Tuesday, April 21, 2009.</p>
<p>The pilot episode both complements <strong>BSG</strong> and differs from it, and does  just enough to keep me wanting more. The way the story flows, the way the show  looks and the underlying moral issues that accompany the plot ring similar to <strong>BSG</strong>,  and it is these qualities that should keep fans engaged, at least in the  beginning.</p>
<p>And yet, <strong>Caprica</strong> is strange &#8211; strange enough that not all fans are  going to stick around. <strong>BSG</strong> was popular not only because of its overall  quality but because it succeeded in being a science fiction show without  relying heavily on science fiction. People who wanted good drama and action &#8211;  but not all the geeky stuff that usually accompanies sci-fi shows &#8211; were able  to watch <strong>BSG</strong>, and not as a guilty pleasure. Furthermore, the show was  filled with space battles and other violence.</p>
<p><strong>Caprica</strong>, on the other hand, feels more futuristic and sci-fi-y,  despite being a prequel. While many things don&#8217;t look that much different from  today, the characters carry around computers on &#8220;pieces of paper&#8221; and  are able to log into holodeck-esque worlds with little headsets. While <strong>BSG</strong> explained away the lack of technology with Adama&#8217;s reluctance to be networked  to the grid, <strong>Caprica</strong> does feel a bit like the <strong>Star Wars</strong> prequels  &#8211; things were much more advanced in the past.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not the gizmos that may turn some fans off. Much of  the pilot episode revolves around a virtual world where Graystone discovers  that his daughter &#8211; a computer genius who was murdered in a terrorist explosion  by a group that accepts only one true God &#8211; has installed a &#8220;copy&#8221; of herself.  In this world, his daughter exists with all her memories, characteristics and  flaws &#8211; just without a body. But Graystone, who has been working on creating  cyborgs, realizes that his daughter may have figured out the missing link &#8211; and  that he can bring her back. However, the bigger question remains: can he bring  back her soul, and even if he can, should he?</p>
<p><strong>Caprica</strong> raises  some very interesting questions, and it&#8217;s these questions that will drive the  show going forward. And yet, dabbling with the reincarnation of one&#8217;s daughter  is quite a bit different than <strong>BSG</strong>,  which despite all the strange things that happened always tended to be grounded  in reality (except for the fate of Starbuck, which I&#8217;m still scratching my head  over). Will the average <strong>BSG</strong> fan  accept this very different environment that is <strong>Caprica</strong>? I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>As for me, I liked the pilot episode, but didn&#8217;t love it.  The acting is strong, and I liked the characters. The show looks great, though  the producers are going to struggle with the visual effects as it&#8217;s going to be  much harder to gloss over a TV budget in daylight, versus the perpetual  darkness that <strong>BSG</strong> benefited from.  The train explosion could have been done better. Overall, though, the producers  have done a good job of creating a show that is similar in appearance and  delivery to its predecessor and yet vastly different in its core focus.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the pilot episode didn&#8217;t blow me away. It  sets the stage, but it&#8217;s unclear how things are going to unfold, how  suspenseful things are going to be and what other characters are going to be  introduced. The number of likable supporting characters is next to zero, and  even the leads are hardly protagonists; Graystone is a bit crazy, and Adama  works for mobsters. Whereas <strong>BSG</strong> worked in the grays as the show went along, <strong>Caprica</strong> starts out with no redeeming characters. If <strong>Caprica</strong> is just going to be a talky  drama with political maneuverings and religious questions, it could get old  quickly; if it ends up being a little more exciting than that &#8211; perhaps like <strong>Damages</strong> &#8211; then it has potential. The  pilot episode just doesn&#8217;t answer these questions.</p>
<p>The <strong>Caprica</strong> pilot  is worth seeing, but it is going to have to show the audience what we should  expect early on to keep people around. It looks to be an interesting show, but  without a genocidal war raging on in every episode, it has the potential to  lose audiences quickly, especially given that it is on the Sci-Fi Channel, a  place even I dared to tread only on Friday nights at 10pm.</p>
<p>In other words: time will tell. The pilot episode is enough  to lure me along, and yet not enough to hook me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/18/dvd-review-caprica-pilot-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Show Review: Patrick Swayze is The Beast</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/14/tv-show-review-patrick-swayze-is-the-beast/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/14/tv-show-review-patrick-swayze-is-the-beast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television/TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick swayze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/14/tv-show-review-patrick-swayze-is-the-beast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Shield is gone, leaving the airways devoid of gritty, gray-and-grayer police drama. Michael Chiklis was a complete badass, and over the course of seven amazing seasons, the writers carved an amazingly complex, suspenseful and believable tale of crime, corruption and tragedy. The last season, especially, was a masterstroke.
And only a few months later, A&#38;E&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/patrick-swayze-beast.jpg" title="Patrick Swayze in The Beast"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/patrick-swayze-beast.jpg" alt="Patrick Swayze in The Beast" /></a><strong>The Shield</strong> is gone, leaving the airways devoid of gritty, gray-and-grayer police drama. Michael Chiklis was a complete badass, and over the course of seven amazing seasons, the writers carved an amazingly complex, suspenseful and believable tale of crime, corruption and tragedy. The last season, especially, was a masterstroke.</p>
<p>And only a few months later, A&amp;E&#8217;s <strong>The Beast</strong> has risen from the ashes to take <strong>The Shield</strong>&#8217;s place. Or at least try.</p>
<p><strong>The Beast</strong> plays out like a down-and-dirty version of the Chris Cooper movie <strong>Breach</strong> mixed with a less captivating <strong>Training Day</strong>; Travis Fimmel stars as Jake, a young, eager cop who has been recruited to partner with Charles Barker (Patrick Swayze). Just as in <strong>Training Day</strong>, Jake is green around the edges and has a lot to learn when pitted against Charles, who will cross the line to accomplish the mission. SPOILER ALERT: It isn&#8217;t long, though, before Jake is confronted with a team of officials who inform him that he has been selected to spy on Charles, given the suspicion that the man is dirty.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, it isn&#8217;t Swayze who has the lead but Fimmel; the narrative stays focused on Jake much more than Charles. Nevertheless, Fimmel holds his own and quickly proves that he can carry the show, and one has to wonder, given Swayze&#8217;s dire circumstances, that this isn&#8217;t completely coincidental. On the flip side, it&#8217;s Swayze who will draw audiences in and keep them there, as he delivers his best performance in years &#8211; though that isn&#8217;t hard, since no one has seen him in years. That fact aside, Swayze growls his way through scene to scene with satisfying brutality, though those expecting Denzel Washington-esque screen chewing should look elsewhere. As good as Trimmel is, this show will live and die with Swayze &#8211; and I sincerely hope that doesn&#8217;t turn into a literal statement.</p>
<p>Neither the pilot episode or Episode 2, titled <em>Two Choices</em>, blew me away; as intense as Swayze is, that intensity doesn&#8217;t always resonate through the show itself. Again, one can&#8217;t help but compare <strong>The Beast</strong> to <strong>The Shield</strong>, and having grown to love that show over seven seasons, it&#8217;s hard to see the same quality here. Nevertheless, only two episodes have passed and both are good enough to give it a few more chances.</p>
<p>In other words, it has potential.</p>
<p>Interestingly, one of the most intriguing aspects of the show is the relationship between Jake and his neighbor Rose, played by the beautiful Lindsay Pulsipher. The relationship serves as a good antithesis to the rest of the show, and I liked the prospect of the issues the couple is going to face in the future. Still, I think the writers jumped the gun by removing much of their conflict by the second episode.</p>
<p><strong>The Beast</strong>, which premieres <strong>Thursday, January 15th at 10pm ET/PT on A&amp;E</strong> hasn&#8217;t won me over, but it&#8217;s intriguing enough to give it a little time. It&#8217;s sad to think that this may be Patrick Swayze&#8217;s final hurrah, but if it is, it is a commendable way to go out. The show maybe similar to bigger and better things, but Swayze&#8217;s performance is top notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/01/14/tv-show-review-patrick-swayze-is-the-beast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex and the City, a Straight Man&#8217;s View</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/15/sex-and-the-city-a-straight-mans-view/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/15/sex-and-the-city-a-straight-mans-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex and the city]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/15/sex-and-the-city-a-straight-mans-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a couple weeks since Sex and the City made its way to theaters, raking in a whole ton of money. I got invited to see the movie opening night, but opted not to stay up to 3am with a bunch of weeping, screaming women. Part of the reason, I&#8217;ll admit, is that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a couple weeks since <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2882/"><strong>Sex and the City</strong></a> made its way to theaters, raking in a whole ton of money. I got invited to see the movie opening night, but opted not to stay up to 3am with a bunch of weeping, screaming women. Part of the reason, I&#8217;ll admit, is that I didn&#8217;t want to be ridiculed by my guy friends for going to see a midnight showing of <strong>Sex and the City</strong>. Another reason: I am not <em>that</em> huge of a fan to sacrifice my beauty sleep for a picture like this.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I finally made my way to see the <strong>Sex and the City</strong> movie, and it was pretty good. In fact, I thought it stayed extremely loyal to the TV show (it probably helps that the writer/director/executive producer of the show is also the writer and director of the movie) and managed to be just as funny as any individual episode.</p>
<p>And, to be blunt, I am straight and single. I didn&#8217;t go see <strong>Sex and the City</strong> because my girlfriend dragged me to it, and I didn&#8217;t see it because of my sexual orientation. Yes, I was one of the few single straight guys in the audience &#8211; perhaps the only one.</p>
<p>Read my full <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/2882/review/"><strong>Sex and the City movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/15/sex-and-the-city-a-straight-mans-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Funny Games Movie Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/11/funny-games-movie-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/11/funny-games-movie-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naomi watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/11/funny-games-movie-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve posted a movie review for the 2008 remake Funny Games, starring Naomi Watts, Tim Roth and Michael Pitt. The movie is directed by Michael Haneke, who also directed the original Austrian version ten years earlier. Anyone know why he decided to remake his own movie? I don&#8217;t know. Even worse, the movie is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/funny-games-dvd.jpg" title="Funny Games DVD"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/funny-games-dvd.jpg" alt="Funny Games DVD" /></a>I&#8217;ve posted a movie review for the 2008 remake <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/2918/review/"><strong>Funny Games</strong></a>, starring Naomi Watts, Tim Roth and Michael Pitt. The movie is directed by Michael Haneke, who also directed the original Austrian version ten years earlier. Anyone know why he decided to remake his own movie? I don&#8217;t know. Even worse, the movie is a shot-by-shot remake, meaning if you&#8217;ve seen one you&#8217;ve seen the other, save some subtitles (assuming the original is indeed subtitled).</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the original <strong>Funny Games</strong>, so thankfully I was able to enjoy this one a lot. It is depraved, disturbing and shocking &#8211; read my <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/2918/review/"><strong>Funny Games movie review</strong></a> here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/11/funny-games-movie-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Red Violin: The Meridian Collection DVD Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/02/the-red-violin-the-meridian-collection-dvd-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/02/the-red-violin-the-meridian-collection-dvd-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meridian collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red violin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/02/the-red-violin-the-meridian-collection-dvd-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It had been almost ten years since I watched The Red Violin, a touching and engaging drama where the main character is&#8230; a violin. No, it&#8217;s not just any violin, but an extremely rare violin fashioned to perfection, painted red and a survivor of several centuries worth of owners.
The movie, directed and co-written by François [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/963/"><img src="http://www.filmjabber.com/contestimages/contest_2558.jpg" alt="Red Violin DVD" height="287" width="200" /></a>It had been almost ten years since I watched <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/963/"><strong>The Red Violin</strong></a>, a touching and engaging drama where the main character is&#8230; a violin. No, it&#8217;s not just any violin, but an extremely rare violin fashioned to perfection, painted red and a survivor of several centuries worth of owners.</p>
<p>The movie, directed and co-written by François Girard, is a sweeping, movie drama that spans the violin&#8217;s creation centuries ago to a modern day auction where the violin is expected to fetch millions of dollars. The violin survives burials, gunshots, affairs, gypsies, communist China and more and tells the stories of its various owners, from the woman who finds that her husband is more fascinated by the unique properties of the violin than by her to the blind nationalism in China that distrusts the West, including Western music.</p>
<p>Having watched the film for a second time &#8211; and having built the movie up in my head for nearly ten years &#8211; <strong>The Red Violin</strong> isn&#8217;t quite as captivating as I remember it, but it&#8217;s still a very good drama with an incredible score and great acting, highlighted by Samuel L. Jackson.</p>
<p>Lionsgate is re-releasing the film on DVD, this time as the first entry in <strong>The Meridian Collection</strong>. Along with another film, <strong>Diva</strong>, <em>The Meridian Collection</em> is set to showcase Lionsgate&#8217;s top films in their library. As one might expect, <em>The Meridian Collection</em> is just an excuse to resell DVDs with minimal effort &#8211; and to make money, nothing more.</p>
<p><strong>The Red Violin DVD</strong> comes equipped with a couple of special features, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>An audio commentary with Girard and co-writer Don McKellar</li>
<li>&#8220;The Oscar-Winning Chaconne&#8221; &#8211; This is an examination of how composer John Corigiliano went about scoring the film. Unlike most films, where the score is added at the end, the score had to built into the screenplay from the beginning as the film often shows complicated finger movements on screen. This is a pretty interesting feature.</li>
<li>&#8220;The Auction Block,&#8221; which explains the fascination with Stradivarius violins and includes interviews with the woman who currently owns and plays the violin that the film is based upon.</li>
</ul>
<p>And that&#8217;s it. <em>The Meridian Collection</em> doesn&#8217;t offer a lot of new bonus features &#8211; all it does is get a Lionsgate product back in front of audience&#8217;s eyes. Of course, when the film is something like <strong>The Red Violin</strong>, a quality picture that few people have seen, that&#8217;s not necessarily a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/02/the-red-violin-the-meridian-collection-dvd-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Indiana Jones 4 a Disappointment?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/22/is-indiana-jones-4-a-disappointment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/22/is-indiana-jones-4-a-disappointment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 05:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indiana jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/22/is-indiana-jones-4-a-disappointment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got back from a Thursday-night showing of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and it is not everything I wanted and more. I liked it &#8211; it was entertaining enough &#8211; but there are some moments in the movie that really push your acceptance as an Indy fan.
Read my full [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back from a Thursday-night showing of <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/599/"><strong>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</strong></a>, and it is not everything I wanted and more. I liked it &#8211; it was entertaining enough &#8211; but there are some moments in the movie that really push your acceptance as an Indy fan.</p>
<p>Read my full <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/599/"><strong>Indiana Jones 4 review</strong></a> here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/05/22/is-indiana-jones-4-a-disappointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
