<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; star trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fanboys Movie Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/11/fanboys-movie-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/11/fanboys-movie-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fanboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-delayed and much anticipated Fanboys came to theaters earlier this year with little fanfare and  promotion, confirming what was long suspected: it just isn&#8217;t that good. Now on  DVD, more people have the chance to view mediocrity at its finest.
Fanboys stars Sam  Huntington, Chris Marquette, Dan Fogler and Jay Baruchel as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2620/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1248" title="Fanboys Picture" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fanboys-picture.jpg" alt="Fanboys Picture" width="225" height="222" /></a>The long-delayed and much anticipated <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2620/"><strong>Fanboys</strong> </a>came to theaters earlier this year with little fanfare and  promotion, confirming what was long suspected: it just isn&#8217;t that good. Now on  DVD, more people have the chance to view mediocrity at its finest.</p>
<p><strong>Fanboys</strong> stars Sam  Huntington, Chris Marquette, Dan Fogler and Jay Baruchel as four friends and <strong>Star Wars</strong> fans who set out on a  cross-country trip to break into Skywalker ranch and steal an early copy of <strong>Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace</strong> from the cold grip of George Lucas himself. Along the way, though, they  encounter dangerous Trekkies, pimps and Native Americans that look a lot like  Mexicans.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/2620/review/"><strong>Fanboys movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/11/fanboys-movie-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVD Review: Star Trek: The Trilogy</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/07/dvd-review-star-trek-the-trilogy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/07/dvd-review-star-trek-the-trilogy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DVD Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek trilogy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It takes a little bit of head scratching to figure out what Paramount is talking about when they refer to the Star Trek trilogy, as I&#8217;m pretty sure there are eleven films released one after the other with no proclamation of a trilogy. But when it comes down to it, there is a three-part story [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1233" title="The Wrath of Khan" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/wrath-of-khan.jpg" alt="The Wrath of Khan" width="225" height="188" />It takes a little bit of head scratching to figure out what Paramount is talking about when they refer to the <strong>Star Trek</strong> trilogy, as I&#8217;m pretty sure there are eleven films released one after the other with no proclamation of a trilogy. But when it comes down to it, there is a three-part story arc beginning with <strong>Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan</strong> and that goes on to include <strong>The Search for Spock</strong> and <strong>The Voyage Home</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>The Wrath of Khan</strong>, as many people would agree, is the best <strong>Star Trek</strong> movie made (and yes, that includes 2009&#8217;s film). In it, an exiled Khan uses his strength and intellect to overwhelm a Star Fleet ship, but his one weakness &#8211; the need for vengeance &#8211; is what Kirk and a crippled Enterprise takes advantage of. I&#8217;ve never been a fan of <strong>The Search for Spock</strong>, as it all seems like an endeavor just to bring the title character back from the dead with uninteresting villains, led by Christopher Lloyd of all people. Lastly, <strong>The Voyage Home</strong>, though featuring a story I would generally find cheesy, is a funny and entertaining way to round things out.<span id="more-1232"></span></p>
<p>If this truly were a trilogy, <strong>The Voyage Home</strong> would have a bit more bang and a little less time travel, but if Paramount wants to call it a trilogy, then so be it. Released a little under a month ago to coincide with J.J. Abrams&#8217; reboot of <strong>Star Trek</strong> (I was supposed to write and publish this article way back then), the DVD set &#8211; valued at Amazon.com at $19.99 &#8211; contains a few new special features, including:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Audio commentaries</em> for all three movies</li>
<li><em>James Horner: Composing Genesis</em> &#8211; I had never thought about the music all that much, but after watching this featurette, I have new-found respect for Horner, who really did enhance <strong>Khan</strong> with some spectacular scoring.</li>
<li><em>Collecting Star Trek&#8217;s Movie Relics</em> &#8211; a featurette for the fan boys, this one looks at some costumes and props that a guy has collected over the years. Mildly entertaining.</li>
<li><em>A Tribute to Ricardo Montalban</em> &#8211; who just died in the last year</li>
<li><em>Three &#8220;Starfleet Academy&#8221; training sessions</em> &#8211; which are all stupid and a complete waste of time.</li>
<li><em>Industrial Light &amp; Magic: The Visual Effects</em> &#8211; given how Star Trek has evolved over the years and usually functioned on a small budget, this featurette is pretty interesting.</li>
<li><em>Spock: The Early Years</em> &#8211; if you want to see a child actor all grown up and reminiscing about his one brush with fame, this is unintentionally quite funny.</li>
<li><em>Star Trek/Sci-Fi Hall of Fame Museum</em> &#8211; given that I live in Seattle just five minutes from the EMP, where the Sci-Fi Museum is housed, I found this one pretty interesting. The featurette really isn&#8217;t about the museum at all but actually is an interview with the writer of <strong>The Wrath of Khan</strong>, who goes on to say he doesn&#8217;t like sci-fi, thought the first movie was boring and so forth. Definitely worth watching.</li>
<li><em>Pavel Chekov&#8217;s Screen Moments</em> &#8211; title says it all</li>
<li><em>The Three-Picture Saga</em> &#8211; as I write this, I&#8217;m thinking I missed this featurette. Might be worth going back and checking it out.</li>
<li><em>Star Trek for a Cause</em> &#8211; looks at the environmental messages the filmmakers were trying to get across.</li>
</ul>
<p>All in all, there are some surprisingly decent special features to be found here, but for the ordinary Trek fan, who probably owns all these movies anyway, the value-add is minimal. The DVD set does boast digitally remastered picture and sound, but I don&#8217;t know how much of a difference that really makes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/06/07/dvd-review-star-trek-the-trilogy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Box Office: Does Star Trek Win Again?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/17/weekend-box-office-does-star-trek-win-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/17/weekend-box-office-does-star-trek-win-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angels and demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer is no, but not by much. Sony had to be a little nervous when looking at Saturday&#8217;s numbers (to get Sunday&#8217;s box office estimates), as Angelys &#38; Demons polishes up with only $48 million, only $5 million ahead of near-repeat offender Star Trek. One can only presume that Sony&#8217;s estimates were $1-2 million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2622/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1146" title="Angels &amp; Demons this Weekend" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/angels-and-demons.jpg" alt="Angels &amp; Demons this Weekend" width="225" height="228" /></a>The answer is no, but not by much. Sony had to be a little nervous when looking at Saturday&#8217;s numbers (to get Sunday&#8217;s box office estimates), as<strong> <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2622/">Angelys &amp; Demons</a></strong> polishes up with <em>only</em> $48 million, only $5 million ahead of near-repeat offender <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a>. One can only presume that Sony&#8217;s estimates were $1-2 million overeager to ensure they could say their film was #1, but regardless, it can lay claim to such a title.<span id="more-1178"></span></p>
<p>Given just how bad <strong>The Da Vinci Code</strong> was, and how much more brand recognition that Dan Brown book has versus this one, $48 million can&#8217;t really be considered a disappointment; in fact, it&#8217;s a little higher than what some analysts were predicting. Still, for a middle-of-May &#8220;blockbuster,&#8221; $48 million isn&#8217;t all that much, and given its rather dismal reviews, strong legs may not be in its future. Expect this one to fade quickly, at least domestically (internationally, the movie has already made over $100 million, so no one can truly consider it a box office disappointment).</p>
<p><strong>Star Trek</strong> dropped only 43% in its second weekend, a sign of strong legs. This movie is soon going to surpass <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2943/"><strong>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</strong></a>, which made $14.8 million this weekend after a 44% drop, despite starting out with a lower opening weekend a week later.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2924/"><strong>Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</strong></a> continues to show that there is room for counterprogramming, as it dropped 33% to bring its total up to $40 million.</p>
<p>Visit the FilmJabber homepage for the full <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/"><strong>box office top ten</strong></a>. I get my numbers from <a href="http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=11621" target="_blank"><strong>Box Office Prophets</strong></a>, who do a great weekend recap each week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/17/weekend-box-office-does-star-trek-win-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Video Movie Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/16/star-trek-video-movie-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/16/star-trek-video-movie-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos/Trailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am finally venturing into the world of YouTube (the creation side, that is), so check out my first-ever video movie review below&#8230; I plan to get some better video editing software than Windows Movie Maker in the near future (am thinking Adobe Premiere, since I already know how to use it) and clearly need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am finally venturing into the world of YouTube (the creation side, that is), so check out my first-ever video movie review below&#8230; I plan to get some better video editing software than Windows Movie Maker in the near future (am thinking Adobe Premiere, since I already know how to use it) and clearly need to improve some things, but with that in mind, comments welcome &#8211; both on my opinions of <strong>Star Trek</strong> and the video itself.<span id="more-1174"></span></p>
<p>Without further ado, here&#8217;s my <strong>Star Trek video movie review</strong>:</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nHK5k3Kcaf0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nHK5k3Kcaf0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Go here to read my more elaborate <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek movie review</strong></a> in good ol&#8217; text format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/16/star-trek-video-movie-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Box Office: Star Trek Has Warp Legs</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/12/box-office-star-trek-has-warp-legs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/12/box-office-star-trek-has-warp-legs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monday box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Star Trek, the massive box office winner of the weekend, turned out to be an even bigger contender than first imagined. The movie earned an additional $3 million on Sunday than estimated by its studio Paramount, giving the first signs that this movie truly is benefiting from word of mouth.
The final weekend tally, including the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1152" title="Zoe Saldana from Star Trek" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/zoe-saldana.jpg" alt="Zoe Saldana from Star Trek" width="225" height="225" />Star Trek</strong></a>, the massive box office winner of the weekend, turned out to be an even bigger contender than first imagined. The movie earned an additional $3 million on Sunday than estimated by its studio Paramount, giving the first signs that this movie truly is benefiting from word of mouth.</p>
<p>The final weekend tally, including the Thursday evening numbers, was $79 million.<span id="more-1151"></span></p>
<p>An even better sign for Paramount was the amount the movie earned on Monday, May 11. Its box office revenue was $7.5 million, much better than <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2943/"><strong>Wolverine</strong></a>&#8217;s Monday take last week, which was $5.4 million. As a better example, <strong>Iron Man</strong> last year dropped from its $100 million take to $6.9 on Monday, a much larger percentage drop.</p>
<p>Even though <strong>Angels &amp; Demons</strong> is going to be big, it&#8217;s not going be as disruptive of a competitor as <strong>Star Trek</strong> was to <strong>Wolverine</strong>, for instance. In other words, Paramount must be seeing gold.</p>
<p>Paramount must be seeing gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/12/box-office-star-trek-has-warp-legs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Warps to Major Box Office Weekend Win</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-warps-to-major-box-office-weekend-win/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-warps-to-major-box-office-weekend-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank the Gods, Star Trek, the reboot by J.J. Abrams, didn&#8217;t implode on itself. This movie was one of the biggest question marks in years in terms of box office potential: it had the look, feel and action of a summer blockbuster, but it was, in the end, Star Trek, a franchise that was considered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1142" title="Spock: You wouldn't like me when I'm angry" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/star-trek-spock-angry.jpg" alt="Spock: You wouldn't like me when I'm angry" width="225" height="201" /></a>Thank the Gods, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a>, the reboot by J.J. Abrams, didn&#8217;t implode on itself. This movie was one of the biggest question marks in years in terms of box office potential: it had the look, feel and action of a summer blockbuster, but it was, in the end, <strong>Star Trek</strong>, a franchise that was considered all but dead just a few years ago after the last film <strong>Nemesis</strong> failed to break $50 million domestic &#8211; as its box office total.</p>
<p>This new <strong>Star Trek</strong> sailed through that number sometime on Saturday, and will finish out the box office weekend with an estimated $76.5 in box office receipts. Saturday&#8217;s numbers were higher than Friday&#8217;s, indicating that the picture isn&#8217;t completely frontloaded due to a fan boy rush, either &#8211; which isn&#8217;t all that surprising given the general appeal this picture has. For the first time ever, my casual moviegoing friends, including all of my female friends, want to go see a <strong>Star Trek</strong> film, and that says something.<span id="more-1141"></span></p>
<p>Sure, $76.5 million isn&#8217;t as huge of an opening as last week&#8217;s blockbuster blunder <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2943/"><strong>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</strong></a>, but no one was expecting it to top that one. However, given that <strong>Wolverine</strong> plummeted 68% to only $27 million in its second weekend, it&#8217;s quite likely that <strong>Star Trek</strong> &#8211; with glowing reviews and strong word of mouth &#8211; will surpass the film in a long run.</p>
<p>J.J. Abrams has successfully rebooted the <strong>Star Trek</strong> franchise, and Trekkies who have been upset about the changes made should rethink their position: it&#8217;s either this or nothing, and <em>this</em> is pretty damn good.</p>
<p>In other box office weekend news, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2924/"><strong>Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</strong></a> showed good legs given its lack of competition, as it dropped only 30% to $10 million this weekend. <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3310/"><strong>Next Day Air</strong></a>, the only other new release and one that no one has even heard of (I haven&#8217;t seen a single commercial or preview) debuted with only $4 million, albeit on just over 1,000 screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-warps-to-major-box-office-weekend-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review: Star Trek (2009)</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 02:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It only took two weeks of summer to get to the good stuff,  as J.J. Abrams&#8217; Star Trek for  non-Trekkies has arrived, and it is quite a spectacle. Exciting action and an  entertaining, swift screenplay are capped by stunning visual effects in what  can only be described as the first blockbuster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1132" title="Star Trek rocks!" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/star-trek.jpg" alt="Star Trek rocks!" width="225" height="177" /></a>It only took two weeks of summer to get to the good stuff,  as J.J. Abrams&#8217; <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a> for  non-Trekkies has arrived, and it is quite a spectacle. Exciting action and an  entertaining, swift screenplay are capped by stunning visual effects in what  can only be described as the first blockbuster <strong>Star Trek</strong> of the franchise. It isn&#8217;t perfect, but it is one of  those movies I will be going to see again in theaters- and those don&#8217;t come  along very often.</p>
<p>As an introduction, I am a <strong>Star Trek</strong> fan. I am not, however, a Trekkie. I don&#8217;t dress up, I  don&#8217;t know the science behind warp drive and I can&#8217;t speak Klingon. I make fun  of Trekkies, but I also have enjoyed all of the television series save for &#8220;Enterprise&#8221;  and most of the movies. I watch both <strong>Star  Trek II: The Wrath of Khan</strong> and <strong>Star  Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country</strong> at least twice a year, and I am slugging  my way through the original series, of which I haven&#8217;t seen every episode.</p>
<p>Read the rest of the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/details/1559/review/"><strong>Star Trek movie review</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/08/movie-review-star-trek-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best and Worst Star Trek Movies: The Ultimate Ranking</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/05/the-best-and-worst-star-trek-movies-the-ultimate-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/05/the-best-and-worst-star-trek-movies-the-ultimate-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 01:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten Movie Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With J.J. Abrams&#8217; Star Trek coming to theaters this Friday, it seemed as good of time as any to put into words the truth about the Star Trek series: the ultimate ranking of the movies. Here you go, and if you disagree, let me know how you&#8217;re wrong:

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
The performances, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1123" title="Why is Captain Kirk so upset if he knows he isn't trapped?" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/star-trek-captain-kirk.jpg" alt="Why is Captain Kirk so upset if he knows he isn't trapped?" width="225" height="189" />With J.J. Abrams&#8217; <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a> coming to theaters this Friday, it seemed as good of time as any to put into words the truth about the <strong>Star Trek</strong> series: the ultimate ranking of the movies. Here you go, and if you disagree, let me know how you&#8217;re wrong:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1111/">Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan</a><br />
</strong>The performances, action and emotion in this movie are beyond comparison. That being said, I almost liked&#8230;<span id="more-1122"></span></li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1114/">Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country</a><br />
</strong>&#8230;as much. In fact, it&#8217;s pretty bad ass and features several great sequences. I&#8217;ve watched this one more than any other <em>Star TrekThe Wrath of Khan</em> movie, including .</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1116/">Star Trek: First Contact</a><br />
</strong>After the disappointing <em>Generations</em>, this one kicked the TNG cast into high gear with a funny, exciting and Borg-filled action flick where the fate of Earth lies in the balance.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1112/">Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home</a><br />
</strong>Though it would be hard these days to pull off a movie such as this (a futuristic cast jumping back to modern time is, shall we say, cheesy), there&#8217;s something just enjoyable and funny about this one.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1115/">Star Trek: Generations</a><br />
</strong>Captain Kirk is killed off in a horribly lame way. This was not how Kirk was meant to die. At least we get to see the Enterprise go down in stunning fashion.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1110/">Star Trek III: The Search for Spock</a><br />
</strong>This Leonard Nimoy-directed film isn&#8217;t particularly good, as it suffers from rather shoddy special effects, a weak screenplay and a disappointingly dull story when compared to the previous film. Christopher Lloyd as the main Klingon villain was horrible casting, too. That being said, the movie isn&#8217;t as bad as some people make it out to be.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1109/">Star Trek: The Motion Picture</a><br />
</strong>The only <em>Star Trek</em> movie that feels truly dated, this one&#8217;s slow, methodical and a little too obsessed with how pretty it thinks it is (though compare it to <em>Star Wars</em>, which came out a year earlier, and it is really not that pretty). But, for what it&#8217;s worth, it&#8217;s still a grandiose film with an interesting ending.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1118/">Star Trek: Nemesis</a><br />
</strong>A lot of people give this one a lot of heat, and in reality it&#8217;s not that great, but it&#8217;s not nearly as bad as some people say. Sure, the villains look like Nosferatus, but it was a step in the right direction&#8230; if only they hadn&#8217;t released it at the same time as <em>Lord of the Rings</em>, which last time I checked has an overlapping fan base.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1117/">Star Trek: Insurrection</a><br />
</strong>This stupid movie had way too much New Age concepts for my taste, and all around came off as a fluffy, uninteresting action flick. But it&#8217;s not as bad as&#8230;</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1113/">Star Trek V: The Final Frontier</a><br />
</strong>&#8230; which is truly bad. William Shatner directed this one, but it didn&#8217;t work out. Captain Kirk versus God is really not a battle anyone needs to see.</li>
</ol>
<p>So, what do you think of the list? Am I right or am I right? And where does the new <strong>Star Trek</strong> film fall into this list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/05/the-best-and-worst-star-trek-movies-the-ultimate-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spock on the Fringe</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/08/spock-on-the-fringe/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/08/spock-on-the-fringe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television/TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leonard nimoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly reported today that Leonard Nimoy is likely to join the cast of Fringe, the hit Fox television show that returned to the airways last night. Nimoy will play William Bell, a former colleague of William Bishop (John Noble) and the mysterious head of Massive Dynamics, the company that has a yet-to-be-defined role in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1021" title="This is how Leonard Nimoy will dress in Fringe" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/leonard-nimoy.jpg" alt="This is how Leonard Nimoy will dress in Fringe" width="225" height="226" /><em>Entertainment Weekly</em> reported today that Leonard Nimoy is likely to join the cast of <strong>Fringe</strong>, the hit Fox television show that returned to the airways last night. Nimoy will play William Bell, a former colleague of William Bishop (John Noble) and the mysterious head of Massive Dynamics, the company that has a yet-to-be-defined role in all of the strange things that have happened.  In other words, this sounds like more than just a one-off cameo but a legitimate guest-starring role.</p>
<p>If the contract goes through, he will appear in the season finale and will be involved in a story arc in season two.<span id="more-1022"></span></p>
<p>As background, the creator of the show &#8211; J.J. Abrams &#8211; is also the director of <strong>Star Trek</strong>, and Nimoy makes an appearance in that movie. Apparently, the guy played a character named Spock off and on for the last few decades.</p>
<p>Let me cap this off by saying that <strong>Fringe</strong> is one of those shows that I look forward to every week. I was&#8230; er, on the fringe&#8230; when the show first started, but it has developed into an entertaining and intriguing sci-fi thriller with some truly weird things. That being said, it also inspired me to start watching <strong>The X-Files</strong> from the beginning, and two seasons in, all I can say is that, even 15 years later, <strong>The X-Files</strong> is a much better show than <strong>Fringe</strong>. But, I don&#8217;t have to choose between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/04/08/spock-on-the-fringe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch the New Star Trek Movie Trailer!</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/03/05/watch-the-new-star-trek-movie-trailer/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/03/05/watch-the-new-star-trek-movie-trailer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.j. abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest Star Trek movie trailer is online, and you can watch it right here. This reimagining of the franchise definitely looks more serious and dramatic than past incarnations, but also looks to up the ante on the action as well. This movie trailer didn&#8217;t completely blow me away, but Star Trek remains one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a> movie trailer is online, and you can watch it right here. This reimagining of the franchise definitely looks more serious and dramatic than past incarnations, but also looks to up the ante on the action as well. This movie trailer didn&#8217;t completely blow me away, but <strong>Star Trek</strong> remains one of my most anticipated movies of 2009.</p>
<p>Watch the <strong>Star Trek</strong> movie trailer now:</p>
<p><center><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="VIgbyiljl4eEip" width="425" height="339"><param name="movie" value="http://www.movieweb.com/v/VIgbyiljl4eEip"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.movieweb.com/v/VIgbyiljl4eEip" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="339"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/03/05/watch-the-new-star-trek-movie-trailer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
