<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmJabber Movie Blog &#187; weekend box office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/tag/weekend-box-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com</link>
	<description>Movie news, previews, reviews, photos, trailers and opinions from Erik Samdahl.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Weekend Box Office: G.I. Joe Blasts to Victory</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/08/09/weekend-box-office-g-i-joe-blasts-to-victory/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/08/09/weekend-box-office-g-i-joe-blasts-to-victory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g.i. joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gi joe box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a sad day in America. Most likely, we&#8217;ll mark this day in our calendars as a day to bow our heads in shame, to ponder how normal American citizens gave so much power away to those money-loving studio heads. For me, it&#8217;s my own personal nightmare (as far as box office nightmares go)&#8230;
Yes, G.I. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3053/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1408" title="GI Joe: Rise of Cobra" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/gi-joe-rise-of-cobra.jpg" alt="GI Joe: Rise of Cobra" width="225" height="225" /></a>It&#8217;s a sad day in America. Most likely, we&#8217;ll mark this day in our calendars as a day to bow our heads in shame, to ponder how normal American citizens gave so much power away to those money-loving studio heads. For me, it&#8217;s my own personal nightmare (as far as box office nightmares go)&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3053/"><strong>G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra</strong></a> overcame incredibly bad buzz and horribly cheesy movie trailers to make $56.2 million in its opening weekend, the fourth-highest August opening ever. This amounts to a per-screen average of over $14,000.<span id="more-1407"></span></p>
<p>I am floored. With everything that I have seen over the last eight months regarding this money, I was hoping &#8211; almost fanatically praying &#8211; that audiences would ignore the strong brand name and give it a $20 million opening or so. I thought it was going to be this year&#8217;s <strong>Speed Racer</strong>. But I fell into the trap movie buffs like me can fall into so easily: I took my personal opinions and extended them to expectations for the film&#8217;s box office performance. I ignored the fact that Paramount has been marketing this film relentlessly; that they were being very selective about who they screened the movie to; that this movie is, in fact, using one of the strongest toy and cartoon brands out there; and that people will go see mindless action films.</p>
<p>But, America&#8230; why?</p>
<p>The only dignity I can hold onto is that despite its fantastic opening, <strong>G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra</strong> is rumored to have cost $200 million (with a lot more spent on marketing) and that it is highly unlikely the film well get to that level. The people who wants to see this movie saw it this weekend; and next weekend, it will plummet over 60%. But I&#8217;m no box office expert, so that&#8217;s just me hoping.</p>
<p>In other weekend box office news, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3305/"><strong>Julie &amp; Julia</strong></a> opened strong in second with $20.1 million, a pretty good take for a cutesy movie that didn&#8217;t seem to have  a very strong hook. <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3316/"><strong>Funny People</strong></a> plummeted to fifth with only $7.9 million, making this movie Judd Apatow&#8217;s first directorial failure. <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3329/"><strong>A Perfect Getaway</strong></a>, despite a 71% fresh rating from the Top Critics, opened in seventh with only $5.8 million &#8211; a poor release date and lack of promotion killed this one. Lastly, the excellent romantic film <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3369/"><strong>(500) Days of Summer</strong></a> broke into tenth place with $3.7 million against only 817 venues.</p>
<p>For the full list of box office winners and losers, visit the <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/"><strong>FilmJabber homepage</strong></a> or read <a href="http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=11894" target="_blank"><strong>Box Office Prophet&#8217;s analysis</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/08/09/weekend-box-office-g-i-joe-blasts-to-victory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Box Office: Does Star Trek Win Again?</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/17/weekend-box-office-does-star-trek-win-again/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/17/weekend-box-office-does-star-trek-win-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 18:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angels and demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer is no, but not by much. Sony had to be a little nervous when looking at Saturday&#8217;s numbers (to get Sunday&#8217;s box office estimates), as Angelys &#38; Demons polishes up with only $48 million, only $5 million ahead of near-repeat offender Star Trek. One can only presume that Sony&#8217;s estimates were $1-2 million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2622/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1146" title="Angels &amp; Demons this Weekend" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/angels-and-demons.jpg" alt="Angels &amp; Demons this Weekend" width="225" height="228" /></a>The answer is no, but not by much. Sony had to be a little nervous when looking at Saturday&#8217;s numbers (to get Sunday&#8217;s box office estimates), as<strong> <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2622/">Angelys &amp; Demons</a></strong> polishes up with <em>only</em> $48 million, only $5 million ahead of near-repeat offender <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a>. One can only presume that Sony&#8217;s estimates were $1-2 million overeager to ensure they could say their film was #1, but regardless, it can lay claim to such a title.<span id="more-1178"></span></p>
<p>Given just how bad <strong>The Da Vinci Code</strong> was, and how much more brand recognition that Dan Brown book has versus this one, $48 million can&#8217;t really be considered a disappointment; in fact, it&#8217;s a little higher than what some analysts were predicting. Still, for a middle-of-May &#8220;blockbuster,&#8221; $48 million isn&#8217;t all that much, and given its rather dismal reviews, strong legs may not be in its future. Expect this one to fade quickly, at least domestically (internationally, the movie has already made over $100 million, so no one can truly consider it a box office disappointment).</p>
<p><strong>Star Trek</strong> dropped only 43% in its second weekend, a sign of strong legs. This movie is soon going to surpass <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2943/"><strong>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</strong></a>, which made $14.8 million this weekend after a 44% drop, despite starting out with a lower opening weekend a week later.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2924/"><strong>Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</strong></a> continues to show that there is room for counterprogramming, as it dropped 33% to bring its total up to $40 million.</p>
<p>Visit the FilmJabber homepage for the full <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/"><strong>box office top ten</strong></a>. I get my numbers from <a href="http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=11621" target="_blank"><strong>Box Office Prophets</strong></a>, who do a great weekend recap each week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/17/weekend-box-office-does-star-trek-win-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Warps to Major Box Office Weekend Win</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-warps-to-major-box-office-weekend-win/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-warps-to-major-box-office-weekend-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/?p=1141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank the Gods, Star Trek, the reboot by J.J. Abrams, didn&#8217;t implode on itself. This movie was one of the biggest question marks in years in terms of box office potential: it had the look, feel and action of a summer blockbuster, but it was, in the end, Star Trek, a franchise that was considered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1142" title="Spock: You wouldn't like me when I'm angry" src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/star-trek-spock-angry.jpg" alt="Spock: You wouldn't like me when I'm angry" width="225" height="201" /></a>Thank the Gods, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1559/"><strong>Star Trek</strong></a>, the reboot by J.J. Abrams, didn&#8217;t implode on itself. This movie was one of the biggest question marks in years in terms of box office potential: it had the look, feel and action of a summer blockbuster, but it was, in the end, <strong>Star Trek</strong>, a franchise that was considered all but dead just a few years ago after the last film <strong>Nemesis</strong> failed to break $50 million domestic &#8211; as its box office total.</p>
<p>This new <strong>Star Trek</strong> sailed through that number sometime on Saturday, and will finish out the box office weekend with an estimated $76.5 in box office receipts. Saturday&#8217;s numbers were higher than Friday&#8217;s, indicating that the picture isn&#8217;t completely frontloaded due to a fan boy rush, either &#8211; which isn&#8217;t all that surprising given the general appeal this picture has. For the first time ever, my casual moviegoing friends, including all of my female friends, want to go see a <strong>Star Trek</strong> film, and that says something.<span id="more-1141"></span></p>
<p>Sure, $76.5 million isn&#8217;t as huge of an opening as last week&#8217;s blockbuster blunder <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2943/"><strong>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</strong></a>, but no one was expecting it to top that one. However, given that <strong>Wolverine</strong> plummeted 68% to only $27 million in its second weekend, it&#8217;s quite likely that <strong>Star Trek</strong> &#8211; with glowing reviews and strong word of mouth &#8211; will surpass the film in a long run.</p>
<p>J.J. Abrams has successfully rebooted the <strong>Star Trek</strong> franchise, and Trekkies who have been upset about the changes made should rethink their position: it&#8217;s either this or nothing, and <em>this</em> is pretty damn good.</p>
<p>In other box office weekend news, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2924/"><strong>Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</strong></a> showed good legs given its lack of competition, as it dropped only 30% to $10 million this weekend. <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3310/"><strong>Next Day Air</strong></a>, the only other new release and one that no one has even heard of (I haven&#8217;t seen a single commercial or preview) debuted with only $4 million, albeit on just over 1,000 screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-warps-to-major-box-office-weekend-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Box Office Predictions: James Bond in Quantum of Solace (2008)</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/11/13/box-office-predictions-james-bond-in-quantum-of-solace-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/11/13/box-office-predictions-james-bond-in-quantum-of-solace-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[box office predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum of solace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/11/13/box-office-predictions-james-bond-in-quantum-of-solace-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantum of Solace, the new James Bond pic, opens this weekend in the United States, two weeks after it opened in other parts of the globe. The movie has already made $161 million, and is primed to crush the $40.8 million opening for Casino Royale a few years ago.
As I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;m no box [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2585/" title="James Bond Quantum of Solace"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/james-bond-quantum.jpg" alt="James Bond Quantum of Solace" /></a><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2585/"><strong>Quantum of Solace</strong></a>, the new James Bond pic, opens this weekend in the United States, two weeks after it opened in other parts of the globe. The movie has already made $161 million, and is primed to crush the $40.8 million opening for <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/1502/"><strong>Casino Royale</strong></a> a few years ago.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;m no box office expert and won&#8217;t pretend to be, but here are what some other websites are saying:<span id="more-664"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>$60 million &#8211; <a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/theampersand/archive/2008/11/12/bob-thompson-quantum-of-solace-bound-for-bond-box-office-glory.aspx" target="_blank">National Post</a></li>
<li>$55 million &#8211; <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/11/12/box-office-quantum-of-solace-arrives/" target="_blank">Cinematical</a></li>
<li>$60 million &#8211; <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/11/13/box-office-tracking-quantum-of-solace-aims-for-60m/" target="_blank">SlashFilm</a></li>
<li>$53 million &#8211; <a href="http://www.themoneytimes.com/articles/20081113/latest_bond_movie_quantum_of_solace_to_top_the_us_box_office-id-1041273.html" target="_blank">Rope of Silicon</a></li>
<li>$76 million &#8211; <a href="http://www.motionselect.com/2008/11/box-office-predictions-quantum.html">Motion Select</a></li>
<li>$65.3 million &#8211; <a href="http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=11105">Box Office Prophets</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Frankly, while Motion Select may be the least reputable site on the list (no offense meant, but I just did a Google search and went down the list), I have to think that a $70+ million opening is in the works for <strong>Quantum of Solace</strong>. If <strong>Madagascar 2</strong> can make $60+ million last weekend, aimed at a younger demographic, why can&#8217;t the new <strong>James Bond</strong> blow that number out of the water?</p>
<p>While <strong>Quantum of Solace</strong> isn&#8217;t getting amazing reviews, it isn&#8217;t getting bad ones, and I have to give this film some comparison to <strong>Batman Begins</strong> and <strong>The Dark Knight</strong>. Fans were hesitant about the renewed <strong>Batman</strong> franchise, found out it was good, and then gave broad approval to its sequel earlier this year. Of course, this latest <strong>Bond</strong> flick isn&#8217;t receiving those stellar reviews, doesn&#8217;t feature a tragic and Oscar-worthy performance, so on and so forth, but <strong>Casino Royale</strong> has its similarities to <strong>Batman Begins</strong>: it took an established, struggling franchise in an entirely new and darker direction; it opened quite well, but made its real gains on word-of-mouth; it also set itself up for something bigger and better.</p>
<p>More than likely, the box office analysts are right, but I won&#8217;t be shocked if they are woefully underprojecting here. Only six more hours until my midnight showing at the Cinerama&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/11/13/box-office-predictions-james-bond-in-quantum-of-solace-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Box Office: High School Musical 3 to Make $55 Million this Weekend</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/10/25/box-office-high-school-musical-3-to-make-55-million-this-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/10/25/box-office-high-school-musical-3-to-make-55-million-this-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friday box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high school musical 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saw 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/10/25/box-office-high-school-musical-3-to-make-55-million-this-weekend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt Disney is going to be very happy this weekend as their unprecedented TV-to-theater movie franchise High School Musical 3 raked in $16.5 million in Friday box office tickets, all but guaranteeing a $50+ million weekend (so says Slash Film) for the harmless teen movie. UPDATE: Slash Film was a bit off&#8230; HSM3 made an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt Disney is going to be very happy this weekend as their unprecedented TV-to-theater movie franchise <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3154/"><strong>High School Musical 3</strong></a> raked in $16.5 million in Friday box office tickets, all but guaranteeing a $50+ million weekend (so says <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/10/24/friday-box-office-high-school-musical-3-hits-huge-with-165m-55m-weekend-likely/" target="_blank">Slash Film</a>) for the harmless teen movie. UPDATE:<em> Slash Film</em> was a bit off&#8230; <strong>HSM3</strong> made an estimated $42 million over the weekend.</p>
<p>Personally, I thought <a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/2007/12/08/dvd-review-high-school-musical-2-extended-edition-dvd-2007/"><strong>High School Musical 2</strong></a> was one of the worst movies I have seen in a very long time; though I am outside of the target market, I just don&#8217;t get it. The music is bad, the choreography terrible and the story so sanitized that I don&#8217;t get how anybody outside of the most protective of families could enjoy it. Maybe they mixed things up for <strong>High School Musical 3</strong>, but I highly doubt it.</p>
<p>Anyway, congrats to Disney for turning the most-watched TV movie franchise into a lucrative box office behemoth.</p>
<p>The best thing about <strong>High School Musical 3</strong>&#8217;s box office success? Lionsgate can&#8217;t claim complete victory as <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2938/"><strong>Saw V</strong></a> opened in second place. The bad news? The movie still made $12.3 million on Friday, good for about $29 million (UPDATE: $30 million) over the weekend. We&#8217;re starting to see the gleam come off the <strong>Saw</strong> movies, but only just. As long as the <strong>Saw</strong> movies continue to make more in their opening weekend than their entire budget, Lionsgate will continue to produce this crap.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2961/"><strong>Pride and Glory</strong></a>, the new movie starring Ed Norton and Colin Farrell, opened to only $2.2 million on Friday, good for just over $6 for the box office weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/10/25/box-office-high-school-musical-3-to-make-55-million-this-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Box Office: Kung Fu Panda and Zohan Box Office Results</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/07/friday-box-office-kung-fu-panda-and-zohan-box-office-results/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/07/friday-box-office-kung-fu-panda-and-zohan-box-office-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 18:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friday box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kung fu panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zohan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/07/friday-box-office-kung-fu-panda-and-zohan-box-office-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, box office predictions had Kung Fu Panda expected to make in the low-to-mid fifties and You Don&#8217;t Mess With the Zohan making around $32 million. Those weekend box office predictions were way off.
The Jack Black family film Kung Fu Panda, the first big animated movie of the year, earned $20.3 million on Friday according [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/zohan-girl.jpg" title="I’m moving to Palestine!"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/zohan-girl.jpg" alt="I’m moving to Palestine!" /></a>Yesterday, <a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/06/zohan-vs-panda-box-office-predictions/">box office predictions</a> had <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2954/"><strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong></a> expected to make in the low-to-mid fifties and <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3024/"><strong>You Don&#8217;t Mess With the Zohan</strong></a> making around $32 million. Those weekend box office predictions were way off.</p>
<p>The Jack Black family film <strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong>, the first big animated movie of the year, earned $20.3 million on Friday according to <a href="http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=10711">Box Office Prophets</a>, which means that the DreamWorks picture is expected to make approximately $65 million over the course of the weekend. Aside from the Shrek movies, this is DreamWork&#8217;s biggest animated opening ever.</p>
<p>As for Adam Sandler, who didn&#8217;t suffer either. Most analysts had his movie pegged at making $15-20 million less than the more family-friendly fare opening this weekend, and they were right. However, <strong>You Don&#8217;t Mess with the Zohan</strong>, where Sandler plays a former Israeli counter terrorist who moves to New York to fulfill his dream of cutting hair only to be pursued by his former enemies, earned $15.2 million on Friday, which should lead to a $41 million opening. Those who were questioning whether Sandler&#8217;s time was fading after the disappointing <strong>Chuck and Larry</strong> were&#8230; wrong.</p>
<p>From the numbers I pulled yesterday, <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> was closest to estimating <strong>Panda</strong>&#8217;s numbers, as it had predicted $60 million in box office receipts. They were the second worst at predicting <strong>Zohan</strong>&#8217;s numbers, however. B<em>ox Office Report</em> came closest to predicting <strong>Zohan</strong>&#8217;s numbers with a $38 million box office estimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/07/friday-box-office-kung-fu-panda-and-zohan-box-office-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zohan Vs. Panda Box Office Predictions</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/06/zohan-vs-panda-box-office-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/06/zohan-vs-panda-box-office-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Samdahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Box Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam sandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kung fu panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend box office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zohan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/06/zohan-vs-panda-box-office-predictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two big films open this weekend, both looking at diametrically different audiences. In one corner, we have You Don&#8217;t Mess with the Zohan, the Adam Sandler comedy almost guaranteed to capture a good chunk of the lucrative teenage fan base, and in the other, Kung Fu Panda, the first major animated film of the year. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/kung-fu-panda.jpg" title="Kung Fu Panda"><img src="http://blog.filmjabber.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/kung-fu-panda.jpg" alt="Kung Fu Panda" /></a>Two big films open this weekend, both looking at diametrically different audiences. In one corner, we have <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/3024/"><strong>You Don&#8217;t Mess with the Zohan</strong></a>, the Adam Sandler comedy almost guaranteed to capture a good chunk of the lucrative teenage fan base, and in the other, <a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/movie/preview/2954/"><strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong></a>, the first major animated film of the year. It&#8217;s Sandler versus Jack Black, gross-out vs. PG, old versus new.</p>
<p>Neither film looks particularly good. <strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong> seems like a lot of special effects without much substance, as the previews fail to suggest that there&#8217;s much of a story or comedy to be found. Seriously, the previews aren&#8217;t funny at all, and if I want to watch Kung Fu, I&#8217;ll watch Bruce Lee. As for <strong>Zohan</strong>, I always hold out hope that Adam Sandler can deliver something entertaining &#8211; and there are some funny moments in the previews &#8211; but after <strong>I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry</strong> turned out to be pretty terrible, I am hesitant.</p>
<p>Needless to say, neither film inspires much love from me, and unless I want to see <strong>Sex and the City</strong> this weekend, this may be a good couple of days to relax and enjoy the warm weather. Unfortunately, I live in Seattle, where it&#8217;s in the 50&#8217;s and raining.</p>
<p>On to the weekend box office predictions for the movie. I&#8217;m no box office expert, so I&#8217;ll leave the analysis to all the so-called box office experts floating around on the Internet. May was a tough month for box office analysts, though you can hardly blame them. Who would have thought <strong>Iron Man</strong> would open to $100 million? That <strong>Prince Caspian</strong> would so under-deliver? That <strong>Sex and the City</strong> would dominate so mightily? That <strong>The Strangers</strong> would actually do well? Anyway, here are the weekend box office predictions for the June 6 &#8211; 8 weekend:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blogcritics.org/archives/2008/06/06/062931.php">Blog Critics Magazine</a> estimates $48 million for <strong>Panda</strong> and $34 million for <strong>Zohan</strong>.</li>
<li><a href="http://mark-berman.blogspot.com/2008/06/weekend-box-office-preview-originality.html">Digressions with Mark the Movie Guy</a> estimates $55 million for <strong>Panda</strong> and $30-32 million for <strong>Zohan</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=10710&amp;cmin=10&amp;columnpage=2">Box Office Prophets</a> estimates $57 million for <strong>Panda</strong> and $30 million for <strong>Zohan</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://www.boxofficereport.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1020">Box Office Report</a> shows $52 million for <strong>Panda</strong> and $38 million for <strong>Zohan</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://www.boxofficepsychics.com/2008/06/06/batttle-royale-box-office-psychics-vs-a-real-psychic/">Box Office Psychics</a> has <strong>Panda</strong> at $45 million and <strong>Zohan</strong> at $37 million</li>
<li><a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10008759-you_don't_mess_with_the_zohan/news/1732700/">Rotten Tomatoes</a> says <strong>Panda</strong> will earn $52 million versus <strong>Zohan</strong>&#8217;s $35 million</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20204896,00.html">EW.com</a> has <strong>Panda</strong> making a whopping $60 million against <strong>Zohan</strong>&#8217;s $32 million</li>
<li><a href="http://www.boxofficeguru.com/weekend.htm">Box Office Guru</a> puts <strong>Panda</strong> at $52 million and <strong>Zohan</strong> at $35 million</li>
</ul>
<p>So, it looks like Adam Sandler really doesn&#8217;t stand a chance, which is not really too surprising. <strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong> appeals to the masses; <strong>You Don&#8217;t Mess with the Zohan</strong> will appeal to Sandler fans. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how <strong>Panda </strong>actually does, though, as there are bound to be some more box office disappointments over the course of the summer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.filmjabber.com/now/playing/">View more new releases</a> this weekend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.filmjabber.com/2008/06/06/zohan-vs-panda-box-office-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
